These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30742474)

  • 1. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.
    Kenny DA; Judd CM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.
    Anderson SF; Maxwell SE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 28266872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconsideration of the type I error rate for psychological science in the era of replication.
    Carlin MT; Costello MS; Flansburg MA; Darden A
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 35404627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science.
    Moreau D; Corballis MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size.
    Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Oct; 146(10):922-940. PubMed ID: 32700942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1515-1539. PubMed ID: 28936638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contemporary applications of moderation analysis in counseling psychology.
    Lorah JA; Wong YJ
    J Couns Psychol; 2018 Oct; 65(5):629-640. PubMed ID: 30010352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges and suggestions for defining replication "success" when effects may be heterogeneous: Comment on Hedges and Schauer (2019).
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 31580141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects.
    Orth U; Meier LL; Bühler JL; Dapp LC; Krauss S; Messerli D; Robins RW
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):421-433. PubMed ID: 35737548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors.
    Gelman A; Carlin J
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 26186114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.
    Maassen E; van Assen MALM; Nuijten MB; Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233107. PubMed ID: 32459806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean?
    Maxwell SE; Lau MY; Howard GS
    Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):487-98. PubMed ID: 26348332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.