These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30742474)

  • 21. Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):127-139. PubMed ID: 33617275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. You Cannot Step Into the Same River Twice: When Power Analyses Are Optimistic.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):612-25. PubMed ID: 26186112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.
    Rhemtulla M; van Bork R; Borsboom D
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 31169371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
    Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research": Correction to Stanley, Carter, and Doucouliagos (2018).
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Jul; 145(7):764. PubMed ID: 31192651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is replication possible without fidelity?
    Ellefson MR; Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1446-1455. PubMed ID: 35049324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of heterogeneity and heterogeneity interval estimators in random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference in education and psychology.
    Boedeker P; Henson RK
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):346-364. PubMed ID: 31599614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science.
    Patil P; Peng RD; Leek JT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Jul; 11(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 27474140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beyond overall effects: A Bayesian approach to finding constraints in meta-analysis.
    Rouder JN; Haaf JM; Davis-Stober CP; Hilgard J
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):606-621. PubMed ID: 31464466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A cautionary tale on treating measurement error.
    Zhang Q
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):308-330. PubMed ID: 35604700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reporting effect sizes in original psychological research: A discussion and tutorial.
    Pek J; Flora DB
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):208-225. PubMed ID: 28277690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using generalizability theory with continuous latent response variables.
    Vispoel WP; Morris CA; Kilinc M
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):153-178. PubMed ID: 30080056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate.
    Bryan CJ; Yeager DS; O'Brien JM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(51):25535-25545. PubMed ID: 31767750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and power: accuracy over inference.
    Bradley MT; Brand A
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 24245076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation.
    Arend MG; Schäfer T
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 30265048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining replicability in addictions research: How to assess and ways forward.
    Pearson MR; Schwebel FJ; Richards DK; Witkiewitz K
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2022 May; 36(3):260-270. PubMed ID: 34435835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses.
    von Hippel PT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():35. PubMed ID: 25880989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.