150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30742643)
1. Minimal medical imaging can accurately reconstruct geometric bone models for musculoskeletal models.
Suwarganda EK; Diamond LE; Lloyd DG; Besier TF; Zhang J; Killen BA; Savage TN; Saxby DJ
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0205628. PubMed ID: 30742643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Best methods and data to reconstruct paediatric lower limb bones for musculoskeletal modelling.
Davico G; Pizzolato C; Killen BA; Barzan M; Suwarganda EK; Lloyd DG; Carty CP
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1225-1238. PubMed ID: 31691037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction of the lower limb bones from digitised anatomical landmarks using statistical shape modelling.
Nolte D; Ko ST; Bull AMJ; Kedgley AE
Gait Posture; 2020 Mar; 77():269-275. PubMed ID: 32092603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-linear scaling of a musculoskeletal model of the lower limb using statistical shape models.
Nolte D; Tsang CK; Zhang KY; Ding Z; Kedgley AE; Bull AMJ
J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3576-3581. PubMed ID: 27653375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging.
Barratt DC; Chan CS; Edwards PJ; Penney GP; Slomczykowski M; Carter TJ; Hawkes DJ
Med Image Anal; 2008 Jun; 12(3):358-74. PubMed ID: 18313973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of femur reconstruction from sparse geometric data using a statistical shape model.
Zhang J; Besier TF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Apr; 20(5):566-576. PubMed ID: 27998170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomography landmark-based semi-automated mesh morphing and mapping techniques: generation of patient specific models of the human pelvis without segmentation.
Salo Z; Beek M; Wright D; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1125-32. PubMed ID: 25680299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
Zheng G
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of statistical shape models of the primary functional bone segments of the foot.
Grant TM; Diamond LE; Pizzolato C; Killen BA; Devaprakash D; Kelly L; Maharaj JN; Saxby DJ
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e8397. PubMed ID: 32117607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical shape modelling versus linear scaling: Effects on predictions of hip joint centre location and muscle moment arms in people with hip osteoarthritis.
Bahl JS; Zhang J; Killen BA; Taylor M; Solomon LB; Arnold JB; Lloyd DG; Besier TF; Thewlis D
J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 85():164-172. PubMed ID: 30770197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a fully automatic shape model matching (FASMM) system to derive statistical shape models from radiographs: application to the accurate capture and global representation of proximal femur shape.
Lindner C; Thiagarajah S; Wilkinson JM; ; Wallis GA; Cootes TF
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Oct; 21(10):1537-44. PubMed ID: 23954703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Full-length radiograph based automatic musculoskeletal modeling using convolutional neural network.
Wang J; Li S; Sun Z; Lao Q; Shen B; Li K; Nie Y
J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112046. PubMed ID: 38467079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An articulated shape model to predict paediatric lower limb bone geometry using sparse landmarks.
Carman L; Besier TF; Rooks NB; Choisne J
J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 172():112211. PubMed ID: 38955093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femur finite element model instantiation from partial anatomies using statistical shape and appearance models.
Nolte D; Bull AMJ
Med Eng Phys; 2019 May; 67():55-65. PubMed ID: 30902520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated segmentation of the femur and pelvis from 3D CT data of diseased hip using hierarchical statistical shape model of joint structure.
Yokota F; Okada T; Takao M; Sugano N; Tada Y; Sato Y
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):811-8. PubMed ID: 20426186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomically corresponded regional analysis of cartilage in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees by statistical shape modelling of the bone.
Williams TG; Holmes AP; Waterton JC; Maciewicz RA; Hutchinson CE; Moots RJ; Nash AF; Taylor CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1541-59. PubMed ID: 20378463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Registration-based segmentation with articulated model from multipostural magnetic resonance images for hand bone motion animation.
Chen HC; Jou IM; Wang CK; Su FC; Sun YN
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2670-82. PubMed ID: 20632578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and Reliability of Marker-Based Approaches to Scale the Pelvis, Thigh, and Shank Segments in Musculoskeletal Models.
Kainz H; Hoang HX; Stockton C; Boyd RR; Lloyd DG; Carty CP
J Appl Biomech; 2017 Oct; 33(5):354-360. PubMed ID: 28290736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
