194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30742712)
1. Marginal false discovery rate control for likelihood-based penalized regression models.
Miller RE; Breheny P
Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 30742712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feature-specific inference for penalized regression using local false discovery rates.
Miller R; Breheny P
Stat Med; 2023 Apr; 42(9):1412-1429. PubMed ID: 36737800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal false discovery rates for penalized regression models.
Breheny PJ
Biostatistics; 2019 Apr; 20(2):299-314. PubMed ID: 29420686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variable selection for binary spatial regression: Penalized quasi-likelihood approach.
Feng W; Sarkar A; Lim CY; Maiti T
Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1164-1172. PubMed ID: 27061299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A permutation approach for selecting the penalty parameter in penalized model selection.
Sabourin JA; Valdar W; Nobel AB
Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):1185-94. PubMed ID: 26243050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Penalized estimating equations.
Fu WJ
Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 12762449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for grouped predictor variables or pathways in high-dimensional penalized Cox regression models.
Belhechmi S; Bin R; Rotolo F; Michiels S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 32615919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of clinically relevant features in hypertensive patients using penalized regression: a case study of cardiovascular events.
Garcia-Carretero R; Barquero-Perez O; Mora-Jimenez I; Soguero-Ruiz C; Goya-Esteban R; Ramos-Lopez J
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Sep; 57(9):2011-2026. PubMed ID: 31346948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study.
Siino M; Fasola S; Muggeo VM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1365-1375. PubMed ID: 27510370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Penalized likelihood and multiple testing.
Cohen A; Kolassa J; Sackrowitz HB
Biom J; 2019 Jan; 61(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 30475389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False discovery control for penalized variable selections with high-dimensional covariates.
He K; Zhou X; Jiang H; Wen X; Li Y
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 30864387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.
Goeman JJ
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 19937997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Penalized generalized estimating equations for high-dimensional longitudinal data analysis.
Wang L; Zhou J; Qu A
Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 21955051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A screening-testing approach for detecting gene-environment interactions using sequential penalized and unpenalized multiple logistic regression.
Frost HR; Andrew AS; Karagas MR; Moore JH
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():183-94. PubMed ID: 25592580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information criteria for Firth's penalized partial likelihood approach in Cox regression models.
Nagashima K; Sato Y
Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3422-3436. PubMed ID: 28608396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Permutation-based variance component test in generalized linear mixed model with application to multilocus genetic association study.
Zeng P; Zhao Y; Li H; Wang T; Chen F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():37. PubMed ID: 25897803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Network-based penalized regression with application to genomic data.
Kim S; Pan W; Shen X
Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):582-93. PubMed ID: 23822182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generalized survival models for correlated time-to-event data.
Liu XR; Pawitan Y; Clements MS
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4743-4762. PubMed ID: 28905409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonidentical twins: Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian lasso for Cox models.
Zucknick M; Saadati M; Benner A
Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):959-81. PubMed ID: 26417963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
