These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30743200)

  • 1. Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.
    Geng JJ; Witkowski P
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2019 Oct; 29():119-125. PubMed ID: 30743200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
    Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.
    Yu X; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 30742475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-adaptive changes to the target template in response to distractor context: Separability versus similarity.
    Yu X; Rahim RA; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Feb; 153(2):564-572. PubMed ID: 37917441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexible target templates improve visual search accuracy for faces depicting emotion.
    Won BY; Haberman J; Bliss-Moreau E; Geng JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2909-2923. PubMed ID: 31974937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
    Rajsic J; Woodman GF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual search guidance uses coarser template information than target-match decisions.
    Yu X; Johal SK; Geng JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1432-1445. PubMed ID: 35474414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of colour complexity and similarity on multiple object tracking performance.
    Wang C; Hu L; Talhelm T; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):1903-1912. PubMed ID: 30453832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.
    Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 26191616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.
    Bahle B; Matsukura M; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):367-386. PubMed ID: 28795834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory enhances visual perception: evidence from signal detection analysis.
    Soto D; Wriglesworth A; Bahrami-Balani A; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):441-56. PubMed ID: 20192541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory can enhance unconscious visual perception.
    Pan Y; Cheng QP; Luo QY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 22323090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.