167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30743960)
1. Estimation of real-driving emissions for buses fueled with liquefied natural gas based on gradient boosted regression trees.
Pan Y; Chen S; Qiao F; Ukkusuri SV; Tang K
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 660():741-750. PubMed ID: 30743960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of bus emission models for different fuel types of buses under real conditions.
Wang C; Ye Z; Yu Y; Gong W
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 640-641():965-972. PubMed ID: 30021329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding and estimating the carbon dioxide emissions for urban buses at different road locations: A comparison between new-energy buses and conventional diesel buses.
Pan Y; Qiao F; Tang K; Chen S; Ukkusuri SV
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 703():135533. PubMed ID: 31767339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On-road pollutant emission and fuel consumption characteristics of buses in Beijing.
Wang A; Ge Y; Tan J; Fu M; Shah AN; Ding Y; Zhao H; Liang B
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 21520811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pollutant Emissions from Diesel Buses Fueled with Waste Cooking Oil Based Biodiesel].
Hu ZY; Lin BQ; Huang C; Wang HL; Jing SA; Lou DM
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Feb; 39(2):626-632. PubMed ID: 29964824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Emission Characteristics of Particulate Matter from Diesel Buses Meeting Different China Emission Standards Fueled with Biodiesel].
Lou DM; Zhao CZ; Xu N; Tan PQ; Hu ZY
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2017 Jun; 38(6):2301-2307. PubMed ID: 29965347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating real-world CO
Yang L; Zhang S; Wu Y; Chen Q; Niu T; Huang X; Zhang S; Zhang L; Zhou Y; Hao J
Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():453-462. PubMed ID: 27443949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating gaseous pollutants from bus emissions: A hybrid model based on GRU and XGBoost.
Hu L; Wang C; Ye Z; Wang S
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 783():146870. PubMed ID: 33866159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical and Chemical Characterization of Real-World Particle Number and Mass Emissions from City Buses in Finland.
Pirjola L; Dittrich A; Niemi JV; Saarikoski S; Timonen H; Kuuluvainen H; Järvinen A; Kousa A; Rönkkö T; Hillamo R
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jan; 50(1):294-304. PubMed ID: 26682775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-world operation conditions and on-road emissions of Beijing diesel buses measured by using portable emission measurement system and electric low-pressure impactor.
Liu Z; Ge Y; Johnson KC; Shah AN; Tan J; Wang C; Yu L
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(8):1476-80. PubMed ID: 21295821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emission inventory estimation of an intercity bus terminal.
Qiu Z; Li X; Hao Y; Deng S; Gao HO
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jun; 188(6):367. PubMed ID: 27220506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing on-road emissions from urban buses in different traffic congestion scenarios by integrating real-world driving, traffic, and emissions data.
Rosero F; Fonseca N; Mera Z; López JM
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 863():161002. PubMed ID: 36535483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the influence of contributing factors and impact degree on bus emissions in real-world conditions.
Wang C; Ye Z; Bi H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(27):36092-36101. PubMed ID: 33682059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health effects caused by primary fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emitted from buses in the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland.
Tainio M; Tuomisto JT; Hänninen O; Aarnio P; Koistinen KJ; Jantunen MJ; Pekkanen J
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 15787764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In-use fuel economy of hybrid-electric school buses in Iowa.
Hallmark S; Sperry B; Mudgal A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21608490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unraveling nonlinear and interaction effects of various determinants on bus gaseous emissions.
Hu L; Bi H; Wang C; Ye Z; Cheng J; Wu H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 812():151427. PubMed ID: 34742955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In-vehicle measurement of ultrafine particles on compressed natural gas, conventional diesel, and oxidation-catalyst diesel heavy-duty transit buses.
Hammond D; Jones S; Lalor M
Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Feb; 125(1-3):239-46. PubMed ID: 17219245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An assessment of air emissions from liquefied natural gas ships using different power systems and different fuels.
Afon Y; Ervin D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Mar; 58(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18376643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimates of carbon dioxide emissions based on incomplete condition information: a case study of liquefied natural gas in China.
Li L; Yang J; Cao Y; Wu J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8847-8861. PubMed ID: 30715711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concentrations and risk assessment of selected monoaromatic hydrocarbons in buses and bus stations of Hangzhou, China.
Li S; Chen S; Zhu L; Chen X; Yao C; Shen X
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Mar; 407(6):2004-11. PubMed ID: 19101019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
