167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30743960)
21. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.
Abrahams LS; Samaras C; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3237-45. PubMed ID: 25650513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Real-time measurements of SO2, H2CO, and CH4 emissions from in-use curbside passenger buses in New York City using a chase vehicle.
Herndon SC; Shorter JH; Zahniser MS; Wormhoudt J; Nelson DD; Demerjian KL; Kolb CE
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(20):7984-90. PubMed ID: 16295865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of database of real-world diesel vehicle emission factors for China.
Shen X; Yao Z; Zhang Q; Wagner DV; Huo H; Zhang Y; Zheng B; He K
J Environ Sci (China); 2015 May; 31():209-20. PubMed ID: 25968276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Natural gas and CO
Ulvestad M; Overland I
Int J Environ Stud; 2012 Jun; 69(3):407-426. PubMed ID: 24683269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Hybrid Electric Bus SCR System Operation and NO
Yang Q; Hu QY; Huang C; Chen Y; Liu JD; Li L; Xiong ZL; Tang W
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Oct; 39(10):4463-4471. PubMed ID: 30229592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Study on the Emission Characteristics of Urban Buses at Different Emission Standards Fueled with Biodiesel Blends.
Lou D; Qi B; Zhang Y; Fang L
ACS Omega; 2022 Mar; 7(8):7213-7222. PubMed ID: 35252711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gaseous emissions from compressed natural gas buses in urban road and highway tests in China.
Yue T; Chai F; Hu J; Jia M; Bao X; Li Z; He L; Zu L
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Oct; 48():193-199. PubMed ID: 27745664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles.
Tong F; Jaramillo P; Azevedo IM
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7123-33. PubMed ID: 25938939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterisation of an urban bus network for environmental purposes.
André M; Villanova A
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Dec; 334-335():85-99. PubMed ID: 15504495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterizing the range of children's air pollutant exposure during school bus commutes.
Sabin LD; Behrentz E; Winer AM; Jeong S; Fitz DR; Pankratz DV; Colome SD; Fruin SA
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 15592444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Particle and gaseous emissions from compressed natural gas and ultralow sulphur diesel-fuelled buses at four steady engine loads.
Jayaratne ER; Ristovski ZD; Meyer N; Morawska L
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr; 407(8):2845-52. PubMed ID: 19185331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vehicle self-pollution intake fraction: children's exposure to school bus emissions.
Marshall JD; Behrentz E
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(8):2559-63. PubMed ID: 15884349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A review of NOx and SOx emission reduction technologies for marine diesel engines and the potential evaluation of liquefied natural gas fuelled vessels.
Deng J; Wang X; Wei Z; Wang L; Wang C; Chen Z
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Apr; 766():144319. PubMed ID: 33421776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterizing ultrafine particles and other air pollutants in and around school buses.
Zhu Y; Zhang Q;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Mar; (180):3-37. PubMed ID: 24834688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Compressed natural gas bus safety: a quantitative risk assessment.
Chamberlain S; Modarres M
Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 15876211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pump-to-Wheels Methane Emissions from the Heavy-Duty Transportation Sector.
Clark NN; McKain DL; Johnson DR; Wayne WS; Li H; Akkerman V; Sandoval C; Covington AN; Mongold RA; Hailer JT; Ugarte OJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 51(2):968-976. PubMed ID: 28005343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting Airborne Particle Levels Aboard Washington State School Buses.
Adar SD; Davey M; Sullivan JR; Compher M; Szpiro A; Liu LJ
Atmos Environ (1994); 2008 Oct; 42(33):7590-7599. PubMed ID: 18985175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gaseous emissions from a heavy-duty engine equipped with SCR aftertreatment system and fuelled with diesel and biodiesel: assessment of pollutant dispersion and health risk.
Tadano YS; Borillo GC; Godoi AF; Cichon A; Silva TO; Valebona FB; Errera MR; Penteado Neto RA; Rempel D; Martin L; Yamamoto CI; Godoi RH
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Dec; 500-501():64-71. PubMed ID: 25217745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical analysis of high particle number emissions from accelerating compressed natural gas buses.
Jayaratne ER; Meyer NK; Ristovski ZD; Morawska L; Miljevic B
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3724-31. PubMed ID: 20384333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
