These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30744509)

  • 41. How abstract is syntax? Evidence from structural priming.
    Ziegler J; Bencini G; Goldberg A; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104045. PubMed ID: 31446328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension.
    Arai M; van Gompel RP; Scheepers C
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 May; 54(3):218-50. PubMed ID: 16973144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evidence for Priming Across Intervening Sentences During On-Line Sentence Comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Swaab TY; Boudewyn MA; Zirnstein M; Traxler MJ
    Lang Cogn Process; 2014 Jan; 29(3):289-311. PubMed ID: 24678136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of weight and syntactic priming on the production of cantonese verb-doubling.
    Francis EJ; Matthews S; Wong RW; Kwan SW
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 20526678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Revealing abstract semantic mechanisms through priming: The distributive/collective contrast.
    Maldonado M; Chemla E; Spector B
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():171-176. PubMed ID: 30268891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Context effects in visual word recognition: lexical relatedness and syntactic context.
    Schriefers H; Friederici AD; Rose U
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1292-303. PubMed ID: 9847552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension.
    Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lexically-driven syntactic priming.
    Melinger A; Dobel C
    Cognition; 2005 Nov; 98(1):B11-20. PubMed ID: 15925357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the limits of shared syntactic representations: When word order variation blocks priming between an artificial language and Dutch.
    Muylle M; Bernolet S; Hartsuiker RJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1471-1493. PubMed ID: 33829840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look.
    Do ML; Kaiser E
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1851. PubMed ID: 29118726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Structural priming in sentence comprehension: A single prime is enough.
    Giavazzi M; Sambin S; de Diego-Balaguer R; Le Stanc L; Bachoud-Lévi AC; Jacquemot C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194959. PubMed ID: 29608612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies.
    Heyselaar E; Segaert K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Lexically independent representation of the monotransitive structure.
    Arai M; van Gompel RPG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Sep; 75(9):1773-1789. PubMed ID: 34751067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The development of abstract syntax: evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost.
    Rowland CF; Chang F; Ambridge B; Pine JM; Lieven EV
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 22986018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Understanding mechanisms in transitive inferences: an eye-tracking study in Korean reading.
    Lee Y; Kwon Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Dec; 117(3):761-74. PubMed ID: 24665796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Masked priming by misspellings: Word frequency moderates the effects of SOA and prime-target similarity.
    Burt JS
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):262-77. PubMed ID: 26530310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.
    Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK; Kello C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):528-53. PubMed ID: 8501429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.