376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30744578)
1. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in specialist oncology centers in France.
Petitjean A; Smith-Palmer J; Valentine W; Tehard B; Roze S
BMC Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):140. PubMed ID: 30744578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab plus Paclitaxel versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine for HER2-Negative Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Wu Q; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Wang F; Li Q
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(4):153-159. PubMed ID: 32187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TURANDOT): primary endpoint results of a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.
Zielinski C; Láng I; Inbar M; Kahán Z; Greil R; Beslija S; Stemmer SM; Zvirbule Z; Steger GG; Melichar B; Pienkowski T; Sirbu D; Petruzelka L; Eniu A; Nisenbaum B; Dank M; Anghel R; Messinger D; Brodowicz T;
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Sep; 17(9):1230-9. PubMed ID: 27501767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a multicenter national observational study.
Delaloge S; Pérol D; Courtinard C; Brain E; Asselain B; Bachelot T; Debled M; Dieras V; Campone M; Levy C; Jacot W; Lorgis V; Veyret C; Dalenc F; Ferrero JM; Uwer L; Kerbrat P; Goncalves A; Mouret-Reynier MA; Petit T; Jouannaud C; Vanlemmens L; Chenuc G; Guesmia T; Robain M; Cailliot C
Ann Oncol; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1725-32. PubMed ID: 27436849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-world and trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: a study of the Southeast Netherlands Breast Cancer Consortium.
van Kampen RJW; Ramaekers BLT; Lobbezoo DJA; de Boer M; Dercksen MW; van den Berkmortel F; Smilde TJ; van de Wouw AJ; Peters FPJ; van Riel JMG; Peters NAJB; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Joore MA
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():238-246. PubMed ID: 28245951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Montero AJ; Avancha K; Glück S; Lopes G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):747-51. PubMed ID: 22200867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Markov model and cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Refaat T; Choi M; Gaber G; Kiel K; Mehta M; Gradishar W; Small W
Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Oct; 37(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 23388565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy versus placebo plus endocrine therapy in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Le V; Zhong L; Narsipur N; Hays E; Tran DK; Rosario K; Wilson L
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Mar; 27(3):327-338. PubMed ID: 33645243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: interim efficacy results of the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 TURANDOT trial.
Lang I; Brodowicz T; Ryvo L; Kahan Z; Greil R; Beslija S; Stemmer SM; Kaufman B; Zvirbule Z; Steger GG; Melichar B; Pienkowski T; Sirbu D; Messinger D; Zielinski C;
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Feb; 14(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 23312888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Compared to Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the United States.
Garrison LP; Babigumira J; Tournier C; Goertz HP; Lubinga SJ; Perez EA
Value Health; 2019 Apr; 22(4):408-415. PubMed ID: 30975391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wan X; Luo X; Tan C; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Peng L
Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(20):3526-3534. PubMed ID: 31287562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advocacy for a New Oncology Research Paradigm: The Model of Bevacizumab in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in a French Cohort Study.
Mery B; Rowinski E; Vallard A; Jacquin JP; Simoens X; Magné N; Doucey P
Oncology; 2019; 97(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 30939479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial.
Rochlitz C; Bigler M; von Moos R; Bernhard J; Matter-Walstra K; Wicki A; Zaman K; Anchisi S; Küng M; Na KJ; Bärtschi D; Borner M; Rordorf T; Rauch D; Müller A; Ruhstaller T; Vetter M; Trojan A; Hasler-Strub U; Cathomas R; Winterhalder R;
BMC Cancer; 2016 Oct; 16(1):780. PubMed ID: 27724870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First-line Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel for HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A French Retrospective Observational Study.
Dieras V; Pop S; Berger F; Dujaric ME; Beuzeboc P; Escalup L; Bidard FC; Cottu PH; LE Tourneau C; Piperno-Neumann S; Laurence V; Robain M; Asselain B; Pierga JY
Anticancer Res; 2017 Mar; 37(3):1403-1407. PubMed ID: 28314310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic Evaluation of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of First-Line Advanced Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China: Using Markov Model and Partitioned Survival Model.
Rui M; Shi F; Shang Y; Meng R; Li H
Adv Ther; 2020 Sep; 37(9):3761-3774. PubMed ID: 32647912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New schedule of bevacizumab/paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer in a real-life setting.
Cannita K; Paradisi S; Cocciolone V; Bafile A; Rinaldi L; Irelli A; Lanfiuti Baldi P; Zugaro L; Manetta R; Alesse E; Ricevuto E; Ficorella C
Cancer Med; 2016 Sep; 5(9):2232-9. PubMed ID: 27416882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Mehta DA; Hay JW
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):677-83. PubMed ID: 24463160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Takeda AL; Jones J; Loveman E; Tan SC; Clegg AJ
Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(19):iii, ix-xi, 1-62. PubMed ID: 17462169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
