These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30745918)
21. Chemomechanical versus drilling methods for caries removal: an in vitro study. Kitsahawong K; Seminario AL; Pungchanchaikul P; Rattanacharoenthum A; Pitiphat W Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-8. PubMed ID: 26486767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study. Avinash A; Grover SD; Koul M; Nayak MT; Singhvi A; Singh RK J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 22918095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Gulzar S; Arora R; Shah AH; Bhardwaj B; Abusalim G; Khalil HS; Wyne AH J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 27965492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie - a papain gel. Kumar J; Nayak M; Prasad KL; Gupta N Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):697. PubMed ID: 23422631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of total microbiota in dentin after mechanical or papain-based chemomechanical caries removal. de Almeida SM; Franca FM; Florio FM; Ambrosano GM; Basting RT Gen Dent; 2013 Jul; 61(4):59-63. PubMed ID: 23823347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An Inamdar MS; Chole DG; Bakle SS; Gandhi NP; Hatte NR; Rao MP J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 33384489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Hesse D; de Araujo MP; Olegário IC; Innes N; Raggio DP; Bonifácio CC Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():169. PubMed ID: 27029801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Glass polyalkenoate bond strength to dentine after chemomechanical caries removal. Burke FM; Lynch E J Dent; 1994 Oct; 22(5):283-91. PubMed ID: 7962906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. Jawa D; Singh S; Somani R; Jaidka S; Sirkar K; Jaidka R J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 20660971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Olegário IC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP BMC Oral Health; 2016 Aug; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27485432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of Caries Removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in Primary Molars: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. Prabhakar A; Lokeshwari M; Naik SV; Yavagal C Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(4):323-329. PubMed ID: 30397377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]