These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30747304)

  • 1. Whose harm? Which metaphysic?
    Brummett A
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2019 Feb; 40(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 30747304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Secular Clinical Ethicists Should Not Be Neutral Toward All Religious Beliefs: An Argument for a Moral-Metaphysical Proceduralism.
    Brummett AL
    Am J Bioeth; 2021 Jun; 21(6):5-16. PubMed ID: 33372859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sufficiency threshold is not a harm principle: A better alternative to best interests for overriding parental decisions.
    Saunders B
    Bioethics; 2021 Jan; 35(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 32905644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.
    Birchley G
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 26401048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The many metaphysical commitments of secular clinical ethics: Expanding the argument for a moral-metaphysical proceduralism.
    Brummett A; Eberl JT
    Bioethics; 2022 Sep; 36(7):783-793. PubMed ID: 35527699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The nature and value of bioethics expertise.
    Vogelstein E
    Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):324-33. PubMed ID: 25256867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is Christian about Christian bioethics? Metaphysical, epistemological, and moral differences.
    Engelhardt HT
    Christ Bioeth; 2005 Dec; 11(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 16423729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intervention principles in pediatric health care: the difference between physicians and the state.
    MacDougall DR
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2019 Aug; 40(4):279-297. PubMed ID: 31407128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The best interest standard: both guide and limit to medical decision making on behalf of incapacitated patients.
    Pope TM
    J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21837885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The harm threshold and parents' obligation to benefit their children.
    Birchley G
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 26733328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Christian bioethics, secular bioethics, and the claim to cultural authority.
    Solomon D
    Christ Bioeth; 2005 Dec; 11(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 16423736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement.
    Archard D; Cave E; Brierley J
    Med Law Rev; 2024 May; 32(2):158-177. PubMed ID: 38052098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pragmatism, metaphysics, and bioethics: beyond a theory of moral deliberation.
    Pamental M
    J Med Philos; 2013 Dec; 38(6):725-42. PubMed ID: 23878348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the appropriate role of reason in secular clinical ethics? An argument for a compatibilist view of public reason.
    Brummett A
    Med Health Care Philos; 2021 Jun; 24(2):281-290. PubMed ID: 33475924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making.
    Ross LF
    J Clin Ethics; 2019; 30(3):183-195. PubMed ID: 31573960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In Further Defense of "Better than Best (Interest)".
    Ross LF
    J Clin Ethics; 2019; 30(3):232-239. PubMed ID: 31573967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Best Interest Standard Is the Best We Have: Why the Harm Principle and Constrained Parental Autonomy Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard in Pediatric Ethics.
    Bester JC
    J Clin Ethics; 2019; 30(3):223-231. PubMed ID: 31573966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley.
    McDougall RJ
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 26552999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasons to Amplify the Role of Parental Permission in Pediatric Treatment.
    Navin MC; Wasserman JA
    Am J Bioeth; 2017 Nov; 17(11):6-14. PubMed ID: 29111941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conceptual challenges to the harm threshold.
    Taylor M
    Bioethics; 2020 Jun; 34(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 31697399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.