782 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30747630)
1. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD.
Richards WO; McRae C
Am Surg; 2018 Nov; 84(11):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 30747630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Warren HF; Reynolds JL; Lipham JC; Zehetner J; Bildzukewicz NA; Taiganides PA; Mickley J; Aye RW; Farivar AS; Louie BE
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3289-96. PubMed ID: 26541740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Nieh A; Bildzukewicz N; Sandhu K; Katkhouda N; Lipham JC
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3225-30. PubMed ID: 26541730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LINX
Skubleny D; Switzer NJ; Dang J; Gill RS; Shi X; de Gara C; Birch DW; Wong C; Hutter MM; Karmali S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 27981382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.
Reynolds JL; Zehetner J; Wu P; Shah S; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 26095560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Asti E; Bernardi D; Bonitta G; Rausa E; Siboni S; Bonavina L
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():82-88. PubMed ID: 29471155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between gastroesophageal junction integrity and symptomatic fundoplication outcomes.
Turner B; Helm M; Hetzel E; Schumm M; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1387-1392. PubMed ID: 31214803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias.
Rona KA; Reynolds J; Schwameis K; Zehetner J; Samakar K; Oh P; Vong D; Sandhu K; Katkhouda N; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2096-2102. PubMed ID: 27553803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet and Dor fundoplication in the treatment of hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Su F; Zhang C; Ke L; Wang Z; Li Y; Li H; Du Z
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1014-1020. PubMed ID: 27680070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. S148: Long-term patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication: a 5-year follow-up study.
O'Neill SM; Jalilvand AD; Colvin JS; Haisley KR; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6851-6858. PubMed ID: 35041056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis.
Guidozzi N; Wiggins T; Ahmed AR; Hanna GB; Markar SR
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Nov; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 31069388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative outcomes of Toupet fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation.
Asti E; Milito P; Froiio C; Milani V; Bonavina L
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jun; 36(Supplement_1):. PubMed ID: 36544397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Warren HF; Brown LM; Mihura M; Farivar AS; Aye RW; Louie BE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):405-412. PubMed ID: 28664433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes.
Rona KA; Tatum JM; Zehetner J; Schwameis K; Chow C; Samakar K; Dobrowolsky A; Houghton CC; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3374-3379. PubMed ID: 29340828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication.
Wu H; Attaar M; Wong HJ; Campbell M; Kuchta K; Denham W; Linn J; Ujiki MB
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7709-7716. PubMed ID: 35169878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Zhang H; Dong D; Liu Z; He S; Hu L; Lv Y
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3684-90. PubMed ID: 26659236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-Term Outcomes Predict Long-Term Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation.
Antiporda M; Jackson C; Smith CD; Bowers SP
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 30556776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Schwameis K; Nikolic M; Morales Castellano DG; Steindl A; Macheck S; Kristo I; Zörner B; Schoppmann SF
World J Surg; 2018 Oct; 42(10):3263-3269. PubMed ID: 29619511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication.
Bonavina L; Horbach T; Schoppmann SF; DeMarchi J
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3449-3458. PubMed ID: 32676727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.
Buckley FP; Bell RCW; Freeman K; Doggett S; Heidrick R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1762-1768. PubMed ID: 28936790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
