235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30753684)
21. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Single Center Evaluation of Comparative Breast Radiation dose of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM), Digital Mammography (DM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
Bicchierai G; Busoni S; Tortoli P; Bettarini S; Naro FD; De Benedetto D; Savi E; Bellini C; Miele V; Nori J
Acad Radiol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 35065889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimated Average Glandular Dose for 1,828 Mammography Procedures in China: A Multicenter Study.
DU X; Wang J; Zhu BL
Biomed Environ Sci; 2019 Apr; 32(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 31217060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of average glandular dose (AGD) in screening and diagnostic digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) towards establishing a reference dose range band (DRB): a developing country experience.
Jeyasugiththan J; Maheshika Bandara BGU; Wickramarathna SHD; Thenuwara H; Satharasinghe D; Pallewatte AS; Hettiarachchi P
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jul; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37463573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.
Shin SU; Chang JM; Bae MS; Lee SH; Cho N; Seo M; Kim WH; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25182628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.
Kawaguchi A; Matsunaga Y; Otsuka T; Suzuki S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 24234736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiation doses in the United Kingdom breast screening programmes 2016-2019.
Loveland J; Young KC; Oduko JM; Mackenzie A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20211400. PubMed ID: 35604717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. AVERAGE GLANDULAR DOSES AND NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN MAMMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS IN TURKEY.
Parmaksız A; Ataç GK; Bulur E; İnal T; Alhan A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 32556186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of the imaging settings in screening mammography using a tracking and reporting system: A multi-center and multi-vendor analysis.
Barufaldi B; Zuckerman SP; Medeiros RB; Maidment AD; Schiabel H
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():137-149. PubMed ID: 32143121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. EVALUATION OF RADIATION DOSE FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING MAMMOGRAPHY IN QATAR.
AlNaemi H; Aly A; J Omar A; AlObadli A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Kharita MH; Rehani MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):354-361. PubMed ID: 32342104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.
Dupont L; Aberle C; Botsikas D; Ith M; Lima TVM; Menz R; Monnin P; Poletti PA; Presilla S; Schegerer A; Stoica LC; Trueb P; Sans Merce M
J Radiol Prot; 2024 May; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38530290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Establishment of regional diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in Western Province of Sri Lanka.
Niroshani HS; Jeyasugiththan J; Senanayake G; Negishi T
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33271512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi C; Karellas A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 17278508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.
Bahreyni Toossi MT; Zare H; Bayani Roodi Sh; Hashemi M; Akbari F; Malekzadeh M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
