These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30753942)

  • 1. Hydrophobic and antimicrobial dentin: A peptide-based 2-tier protective system for dental resin composite restorations.
    Moussa DG; Fok A; Aparicio C
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Apr; 88():251-265. PubMed ID: 30753942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin Priming with Amphipathic Antimicrobial Peptides.
    Moussa DG; Kirihara JA; Ye Z; Fischer NG; Khot J; Witthuhn BA; Aparicio C
    J Dent Res; 2019 Sep; 98(10):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 31313946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
    Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Targeting the oral plaque microbiome with immobilized anti-biofilm peptides at tooth-restoration interfaces.
    Moussa DG; Aparicio C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235283. PubMed ID: 32614918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Degradation in the dentin-composite interface subjected to multi-species biofilm challenges.
    Li Y; Carrera C; Chen R; Li J; Lenton P; Rudney JD; Jones RS; Aparicio C; Fok A
    Acta Biomater; 2014 Jan; 10(1):375-83. PubMed ID: 24008178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsive antimicrobial dental adhesive based on drug-silica co-assembled particles.
    Stewart CA; Hong JH; Hatton BD; Finer Y
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Aug; 76():283-294. PubMed ID: 29940367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human neutrophils degrade methacrylate resin composites and tooth dentin.
    Gitalis R; Zhou L; Marashdeh MQ; Sun C; Glogauer M; Finer Y
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Apr; 88():325-331. PubMed ID: 30807874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Tagami J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(2):105-13; discussion 113. PubMed ID: 12762474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating.
    Okuda M; Nikaido T; Maruoka R; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):38-46; discussion 47-8. PubMed ID: 17244149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interfacial degradation of adhesive composite restorations mediated by oral biofilms and mechanical challenge in an extracted tooth model of secondary caries.
    Carrera CA; Li Y; Chen R; Aparicio C; Fok A; Rudney J
    J Dent; 2017 Nov; 66():62-70. PubMed ID: 28843960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Bioactive Primers on Bacterial-Induced Secondary Caries at the Tooth-Resin Interface.
    Kim GE; Leme-Kraus AA; Phansalkar R; Viana G; Wu C; Chen SN; Pauli GF; Bedran-Russo A
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 27892838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
    Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four-year clinical prospective follow-up of resin composite restoration after selective caries removal using Er:YAG laser.
    Valério RA; Galo R; Galafassi D; Corona SAM; Borsatto MC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2271-2283. PubMed ID: 31686235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-sectional radiographic survey of amalgam and resin-based composite posterior restorations.
    Levin L; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 17625635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.