310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30754024)
21. Role of HA and BG in engineering poly(ε-caprolactone) porous scaffolds for accelerating cranial bone regeneration.
Yin HM; Li X; Wang P; Ren Y; Liu W; Xu JZ; Li JH; Li ZM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2019 Mar; 107(3):654-662. PubMed ID: 30474348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Cheng N; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Shi B
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81014. PubMed ID: 24265840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigating the mechanical, physiochemical and osteogenic properties in gelatin-chitosan-bioactive nanoceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo.
Dasgupta S; Maji K; Nandi SK
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Jan; 94():713-728. PubMed ID: 30423758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sequential Therapy for Bone Regeneration by Cerium Oxide-Reinforced 3D-Printed Bioactive Glass Scaffolds.
Zhang M; Zhai X; Ma T; Huang Y; Jin M; Yang H; Fu H; Zhang S; Sun T; Jin X; Du Y; Yan CH
ACS Nano; 2023 Mar; 17(5):4433-4444. PubMed ID: 36802532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomimetic reduced graphene oxide coated collagen scaffold for in situ bone regeneration.
Bahrami S; Baheiraei N; Shahrezaee M
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16783. PubMed ID: 34408206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rubidium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds support angiogenesis, osteogenesis and antibacterial activity.
He X; Liu Y; Tan Y; Grover LM; Song J; Duan S; Zhao D; Tan X
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Dec; 105():110155. PubMed ID: 31546446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Chemically and physically cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol-borosilicate gel hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration.
Pang L; Shen Y; Hu H; Zeng X; Huang W; Gao H; Wang H; Wang D
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Dec; 105():110076. PubMed ID: 31546443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vacuumed collagen-impregnated bioglass scaffolds: Characterization and influence on proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells.
Kido HW; Gabbai-Armelin PR; Avanzi IR; da Silva AC; Fernandes KR; Fortulan CA; Rennó ACM
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Feb; 107(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 29569333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of cerium-doped bioactive glass incorporation on an alginate/gelatin scaffold for bone tissue engineering: In vitro characterizations.
Mostajeran H; Baheiraei N; Bagheri H
Int J Biol Macromol; 2024 Jan; 255():128094. PubMed ID: 37977466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preparation of dexamethasone-loaded biphasic calcium phosphate nanoparticles/collagen porous composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Chen Y; Kawazoe N; Chen G
Acta Biomater; 2018 Feb; 67():341-353. PubMed ID: 29242161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bone regeneration in 3D printing bioactive ceramic scaffolds with improved tissue/material interface pore architecture in thin-wall bone defect.
Shao H; Ke X; Liu A; Sun M; He Y; Yang X; Fu J; Liu Y; Zhang L; Yang G; Xu S; Gou Z
Biofabrication; 2017 Apr; 9(2):025003. PubMed ID: 28287077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo.
Kim JA; Lim J; Naren R; Yun HS; Park EK
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 44():155-67. PubMed ID: 27554019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility assessment of free radical scavenging nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration.
Dulany K; Hepburn K; Goins A; Allen JB
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2020 Feb; 108(2):301-315. PubMed ID: 31606924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Osteoinductive fibrous scaffolds of biopolymer/mesoporous bioactive glass nanocarriers with excellent bioactivity and long-term delivery of osteogenic drug.
El-Fiqi A; Kim JH; Kim HW
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jan; 7(2):1140-52. PubMed ID: 25531645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis induced by porous β-CaSiO(3)/PDLGA composite scaffold via activation of AMPK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathways.
Wang C; Lin K; Chang J; Sun J
Biomaterials; 2013 Jan; 34(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 23069715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cerium (III) and (IV) containing mesoporous glasses/alginate beads for bone regeneration: bioactivity, biocompatibility and reactive oxygen species activity.
Varini E; Sánchez-Salcedo S; Malavasi G; Lusvardi G; Vallet-Regí M; Salinas AJ
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Dec; 105():. PubMed ID: 31507308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional printing of strontium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration.
Zhang J; Zhao S; Zhu Y; Huang Y; Zhu M; Tao C; Zhang C
Acta Biomater; 2014 May; 10(5):2269-81. PubMed ID: 24412143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Amorphous carbon modification on implant surface: a general strategy to enhance osteogenic differentiation for diverse biomaterials via FAK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways.
Zhang X; Li H; Liu J; Wang H; Sun W; Lin K; Wang X; Shen SG
J Mater Chem B; 2019 Apr; 7(15):2518-2533. PubMed ID: 32255129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lanthanum phosphate/chitosan scaffolds enhance cytocompatibility and osteogenic efficiency via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Hu H; Zhao P; Liu J; Ke Q; Zhang C; Guo Y; Ding H
J Nanobiotechnology; 2018 Nov; 16(1):98. PubMed ID: 30497456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Strontium hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanohybrid scaffolds with enhanced osteoinductivity for bone tissue engineering.
Lei Y; Xu Z; Ke Q; Yin W; Chen Y; Zhang C; Guo Y
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Mar; 72():134-142. PubMed ID: 28024569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
