These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30754721)

  • 1. Selecting Near-Native Protein Structures from Predicted Decoy Sets Using Ordered Graphlet Degree Similarity.
    Han X; Li L; Lu Y
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 30754721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.
    Zhang Y; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Biophys J; 2003 Aug; 85(2):1145-64. PubMed ID: 12885659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERs.
    Randall A; Baldi P
    BMC Struct Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():52. PubMed ID: 19055744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions.
    Wang K; Fain B; Levitt M; Samudrala R
    BMC Struct Biol; 2004 Jun; 4():8. PubMed ID: 15207004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GR-Align: fast and flexible alignment of protein 3D structures using graphlet degree similarity.
    Malod-Dognin N; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2014 May; 30(9):1259-65. PubMed ID: 24443377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deriving topology and sequence alignment for the helix skeleton in low-resolution protein density maps.
    Lu Y; He J; Strauss CE
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2008 Feb; 6(1):183-201. PubMed ID: 18324752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ranking near-native candidate protein structures via random forest classification.
    Wu H; Huang H; Lu W; Fu Q; Ding Y; Qiu J; Li H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 25):683. PubMed ID: 31874596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models?
    Taly JF; Marin A; Gibrat JF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():6. PubMed ID: 18179702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking Methods of Protein Structure Alignment.
    Sykes J; Holland BR; Charleston MA
    J Mol Evol; 2020 Sep; 88(7):575-597. PubMed ID: 32725409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.
    Lu H; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2001 Aug; 44(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 11455595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.
    Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr; 25(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 15011258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential for assessing quality of protein structure based on contact number prediction.
    Ishida T; Nakamura S; Shimizu K
    Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):940-7. PubMed ID: 16788993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel approach to decoy set generation: designing a physical energy function having local minima with native structure characteristics.
    Keasar C; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 2003 May; 329(1):159-74. PubMed ID: 12742025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A computational pathway for bracketing native-like structures fo small alpha helical globular proteins.
    Narang P; Bhushan K; Bose S; Jayaram B
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2005 Jun; 7(11):2364-75. PubMed ID: 19785123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variable gap penalty for protein sequence-structure alignment.
    Madhusudhan MS; Marti-Renom MA; Sanchez R; Sali A
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Mar; 19(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 16423846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decoy selection for protein structure prediction via extreme gradient boosting and ranking.
    Akhter N; Chennupati G; Djidjev H; Shehu A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 21(Suppl 1):189. PubMed ID: 33297949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
    Tsai J; Bonneau R; Morozov AV; Kuhlman B; Rohl CA; Baker D
    Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Entropy-accelerated exact clustering of protein decoys.
    Berenger F; Zhou Y; Shrestha R; Zhang KY
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Apr; 27(7):939-45. PubMed ID: 21310747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ab initio protein structure prediction using chunk-TASSER.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    Biophys J; 2007 Sep; 93(5):1510-8. PubMed ID: 17496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.