These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30755111)

  • 1. MRI findings, metal ion levels and clinical outcome of a complete series of large metal on metal THA: what's really going on?
    Marchica D; Gallazzi E; Materazzi G; Battaglia GA; Zagra L
    Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):48-53. PubMed ID: 30755111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adverse reaction to metal debris after small-head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: an increasing concern.
    D'Angelo F; Tanas D; Gallazzi E; Zagra L
    Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):35-42. PubMed ID: 30755124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI Findings in Patients After Small-Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years.
    Reiner T; Do TD; Klotz MC; Hertzsch F; Seelmann K; Gaida MM; Weber MA; Gotterbarm T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1540-1546. PubMed ID: 28926383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse Tissue Reactions and Metal Ion Behavior After Small-Head Metasul Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.
    Ishida T; Tateiwa T; Takahashi Y; Nishikawa Y; Shishido T; Masaoka T; Yamamoto K
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Feb; 14(2):264-273. PubMed ID: 34910382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.
    Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W
    Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adverse reaction to metal debris after ReCap-M2A-Magnum large-diameter-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Mokka J; Junnila M; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Pölönen T; Vahlberg T; Mattila K; Tuominen EK; Rantakokko J; Aärimaa V; Kukkonen J; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2013 Dec; 84(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 24171688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.
    Meriem S; Antoniadis A; Palazzuolo M; Wegrzyn J
    Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):719-727. PubMed ID: 37907694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Is the Clinical Presentation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty? An MRI Study.
    Galea VP; Laaksonen I; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Nortje M; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):353-360. PubMed ID: 30794223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood Metal Ion Thresholds to Identify Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: An External Multicenter Validation Study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Implants.
    Matharu GS; Berryman F; Judge A; Reito A; McConnell J; Lainiala O; Young S; Eskelinen A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1532-1539. PubMed ID: 28926382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-Term Outcomes After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 28-mm Head: A 17- to 23-Year Follow-Up Study of a Previous Report.
    Moon JK; Kim Y; Hwang KT; Yang JH; Oh YH; Kim YH
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2165-2172. PubMed ID: 29656971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PET/CT to detect adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: an exploratory prospective study.
    Aro E; Seppänen M; Mäkelä KT; Luoto P; Roivainen A; Aro HT
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):847-855. PubMed ID: 29280283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blood Metal Ion Levels Have Limited Utility in the Surveillance of Asymptomatic Large-Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Kiran M; Armstrong C; Shivarathre D; Peter VK
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3685-3688. PubMed ID: 28781016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Host-specific factors affect the pathogenesis of adverse reaction to metal debris.
    Lehtovirta L; Reito A; Lainiala O; Parkkinen J; Hothi H; Henckel J; Hart A; Eskelinen A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):195. PubMed ID: 31054584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similar incidence of periprosthetic fluid collections after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties and metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties: results of a screening metal artefact reduction sequence-MRI study.
    Bisseling P; de Wit BW; Hol AM; van Gorp MJ; van Kampen A; van Susante JL
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 26330582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
    Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW; Judge A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Dec; 17(1):495. PubMed ID: 27955657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.
    Higuchi Y; Seki T; Takegami Y; Komatsu D; Morita D; Ishiguro N
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 30269967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Declining Revision Burden of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties.
    Lainiala OS; Reito AP; Nieminen JJ; Eskelinen AP
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2058-2064.e1. PubMed ID: 31174908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic Screening of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris after Recap-M2A-Magnum Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Mäntymäki H; Junnila M; Lankinen P; Seppänen M; Vahlberg T; Mäkelä KT
    Scand J Surg; 2017 Dec; 106(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 28737077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.