222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30755221)
1. The role of scientific evidence in decisions to adopt complex innovations in cancer care settings: a multiple case study in Nova Scotia, Canada.
Urquhart R; Kendell C; Geldenhuys L; Ross A; Rajaraman M; Folkes A; Madden LL; Sullivan V; Rayson D; Porter GA
Implement Sci; 2019 Feb; 14(1):14. PubMed ID: 30755221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health System-Level Factors Influence the Implementation of Complex Innovations in Cancer Care.
Urquhart R; Jackson L; Sargeant J; Porter GA; Grunfeld E
Healthc Policy; 2015 Nov; 11(2):102-18. PubMed ID: 26742119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.
Kyratsis Y; Ahmad R; Holmes A
Implement Sci; 2012 Mar; 7():22. PubMed ID: 22436094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the interpersonal-, organization-, and system-level factors that influence the implementation and use of an innovation-synoptic reporting-in cancer care.
Urquhart R; Porter GA; Grunfeld E; Sargeant J
Implement Sci; 2012 Mar; 7():12. PubMed ID: 22380718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: a multiple case study of synoptic reporting.
Urquhart R; Porter GA; Sargeant J; Jackson L; Grunfeld E
Implement Sci; 2014 Sep; 9():121. PubMed ID: 25224952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective multiple case study of the impact of emerging scientific evidence on established colorectal cancer screening programs: a study protocol.
Geddie H; Dobrow MJ; Hoch JS; Rabeneck L
Implement Sci; 2012 Jun; 7():51. PubMed ID: 22656648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. COVID-19 - an opportunity to improve access to primary care through organizational innovations? A qualitative multiple case study in Quebec and Nova Scotia (Canada).
Breton M; Marshall EG; Deslauriers V; Smithman MA; Moritz LR; Buote R; Morrison B; Christian EK; McKay M; Stringer K; Godard-Sebillotte C; Sourial N; Laberge M; MacKenzie A; Isenor JE; Duhoux A; Ashcroft R; Mathews M; Cossette B; Hudon C; McDougall B; Guénette L; Kirkwood R; Green ME
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jun; 22(1):759. PubMed ID: 35676668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adoption of an innovation to repair aortic aneurysms at a Canadian hospital: a qualitative case study and evaluation.
Danjoux NM; Martin DK; Lehoux PN; Harnish JL; Shaul RZ; Bernstein M; Urbach DR
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():182. PubMed ID: 18005409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Smarter hospital care].
Ubbink DT; Papadopoulos NE; Legemate DA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 158():A6957. PubMed ID: 24893809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback.
Turner S; D'Lima D; Hudson E; Morris S; Sheringham J; Swart N; Fulop NJ
Implement Sci; 2017 Dec; 12(1):145. PubMed ID: 29202772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Making It Happen: Middle Managers' Roles in Innovation Implementation in Health Care.
Urquhart R; Kendell C; Folkes A; Reiman T; Grunfeld E; Porter GA
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2018 Dec; 15(6):414-423. PubMed ID: 30291739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Learning Communities to Support Adoption of Health Care Innovations.
Carpenter D; Hassell S; Mardon R; Fair S; Johnson M; Siegel S; Nix M
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2018 Oct; 44(10):566-573. PubMed ID: 30064957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When the user is not the chooser: learning from stakeholder involvement in technology adoption decisions in infection control.
Ahmad R; Kyratsis Y; Holmes A
J Hosp Infect; 2012 Jul; 81(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 22633278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision to adopt medical technology: case study of breast cancer radiotherapy techniques.
Gold HT; Pitrelli K; Hayes MK; Murphy MM
Med Decis Making; 2014 Nov; 34(8):1006-15. PubMed ID: 25009191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.
Donaldson NE; Rutledge DN; Ashley J
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2004; 1 Suppl 1():S41-51. PubMed ID: 17129334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transformation of anesthesia for ambulatory orthopedic surgery: A mixed-methods study of a diffusion of innovation in healthcare.
Leggott KT; Martin M; Sklar D; Helitzer D; Rosett R; Crandall C; Vagh F; Mercer D
Healthc (Amst); 2016 Sep; 4(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 27637824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adopting, implementing and assimilating coproduced health and social care innovations involving structurally vulnerable populations: findings from a longitudinal, multiple case study design in Canada, Scotland and Sweden.
Mulvale G; Green J; Robert G; Larkin M; Vackerberg N; Kjellström S; Hossain P; Moll S; Lim E; Craythorne SL
Health Res Policy Syst; 2024 Apr; 22(1):42. PubMed ID: 38566129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing middle managers' commitment to the implementation of innovations in cancer care.
Urquhart R; Kendell C; Folkes A; Reiman T; Grunfeld E; Porter G
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2019 Apr; 24(2):91-99. PubMed ID: 30290703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
