These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30758406)

  • 1. The effect of enamel matrix derivatives on root coverage: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
    Aydinyurt HS; Tekin Y; Ertugrul AS
    Braz Oral Res; 2019 Feb; 33():e006. PubMed ID: 30758406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial.
    Roman A; Soancă A; Kasaj A; Stratul SI
    J Periodontal Res; 2013 Oct; 48(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 23317049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
    McGuire MK; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
    Alkan EA; Parlar A
    J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects.
    Chambrone L; Salinas Ortega MA; Sukekava F; Rotundo R; Kalemaj Z; Buti J; Pini Prato GP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD007161. PubMed ID: 30277568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
    Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of biologics in root coverage and gingival augmentation therapy: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Chambrone L; Barootchi S; Avila-Ortiz G
    J Periodontol; 2022 Dec; 93(12):1771-1802. PubMed ID: 36279123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
    Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage in patients with multiple gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study.
    Alexiou A; Vouros I; Menexes G; Konstantinidis A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(5):381-389. PubMed ID: 28396887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes.
    Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 24117676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
    Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study.
    Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Basso M; Weinstein RL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 15948683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
    Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
    J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The coronally advanced flap in combination with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of gingival recession: a comparative study.
    Jankovic S; Aleksic Z; Milinkovic I; Dimitrijevic B
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 20820456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measurement technology for volumetric comparison of soft tissue changes.
    Zuhr O; Akakpo D; Eickholz P; Vach K; Hürzeler MB; Petsos H;
    J Clin Periodontol; 2021 Jul; 48(7):949-961. PubMed ID: 33847022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a split-mouth randomized study.
    Henriques PS; Pelegrine AA; Nogueira AA; Borghi MM
    J Oral Sci; 2010 Sep; 52(3):463-71. PubMed ID: 20881341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller Class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: A report of 12 cases.
    Sculean A; Cosgarea R; Stähli A; Katsaros C; Arweiler NB; Miron RJ; Deppe H
    Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(8):653-9. PubMed ID: 27446995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Split-mouth evaluation of connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of isolated gingival recession defects in dogs.
    Shirakata Y; Nakamura T; Shinohara Y; Nakamura-Hasegawa K; Hashiguchi C; Takeuchi N; Imafuji T; Sculean A; Noguchi K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3339-3349. PubMed ID: 30506228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
    Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.