291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30758513)
1. Comparison of force loss due to friction of different wire sizes and materials in conventional and new self-ligating orthodontic brackets during simulated canine retraction.
El-Bialy T; Alobeid A; Dirk C; Jäger A; Keilig L; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Mar; 80(2):68-78. PubMed ID: 30758513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative assessment of frictional forces between differently designed esthetic brackets during simulated canine retraction.
Youssef A; El-Bialy T; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Oct; 84(Suppl 3):222-230. PubMed ID: 36441190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Khawatmi S; Dirk C; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 28339591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of different media on frictional forces between tribological systems made from self-ligating brackets in combination with different stainless steel wire dimensions.
Li H; Stocker T; Bamidis EP; Sabbagh H; Baumert U; Mertmann M; Wichelhaus A
Dent Mater J; 2021 Sep; 40(5):1250-1256. PubMed ID: 34193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.
Holtmann S; Konermann A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Montasser M; El-Bialy T; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 25344125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets.
Burrow SJ
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 20482346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
Reimann S; Bourauel C; Weber A; Dirk C; Lietz T
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
