These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30758880)

  • 41. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Asymmetric mismatch in strain-specific genital morphology causes increased harm to Drosophila females.
    Masly JP; Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2014 Aug; 68(8):2401-11. PubMed ID: 24758304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Direct and indirect effects of male genital elaboration in female seed beetles.
    Arnqvist G; Grieshop K; Hotzy C; Rönn J; Polak M; Rowe L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1954):20211068. PubMed ID: 34229496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Inter-genomic sexual conflict drives antagonistic coevolution in harvester ants.
    Herrmann M; Cahan SH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25355474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Predation-associated divergence of male genital morphology in a livebearing fish.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Langerhans RB
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 26(10):2135-45. PubMed ID: 23980714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Experimental evolution reveals trade-offs between mating and immunity.
    McNamara KB; Wedell N; Simmons LW
    Biol Lett; 2013 Aug; 9(4):20130262. PubMed ID: 23720521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Significance of constraints on genital coevolution: Why do female Drosophila appear to cooperate with males by accepting harmful matings?
    Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2016 Jul; 70(7):1674-83. PubMed ID: 27174423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Condition dependence of male and female genital structures in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).
    Cayetano L; Bonduriansky R
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jul; 28(7):1364-72. PubMed ID: 26077617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Male contest competition and the coevolution of weaponry and testes in pinnipeds.
    Fitzpatrick JL; Almbro M; Gonzalez-Voyer A; Kolm N; Simmons LW
    Evolution; 2012 Nov; 66(11):3595-604. PubMed ID: 23106721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.
    Brennan PL; Prum RO
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2324-38. PubMed ID: 22777020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Female genitalia can evolve more rapidly and divergently than male genitalia.
    Simmons LW; Fitzpatrick JL
    Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1312. PubMed ID: 30899023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes.
    Rowe L; Arnqvist G
    Evolution; 2002 Apr; 56(4):754-67. PubMed ID: 12038533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The evolution of harm--effect of sexual conflicts and population size.
    Gay L; Hosken DJ; Eady P; Vasudev R; Tregenza T
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):725-37. PubMed ID: 21050188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Female behaviour and the interaction of male and female genital traits mediate sperm transfer during mating.
    Friesen CR; Uhrig EJ; Mason RT; Brennan PL
    J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):952-64. PubMed ID: 26809830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict.
    Lessells CM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):301-17. PubMed ID: 16612889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of the male nuptial gift and female feeding behaviour in decorated crickets.
    Burns-Dunn S; Mortys T; House CM; Mitchell C; Duffield KR; Foquet B; Sadd BM; Sakaluk SK; Hunt J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jul; 291(2026):20240804. PubMed ID: 38955230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Brown WD; Miller GT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1467):557-63. PubMed ID: 11297171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evolutionary response to sexual selection in male genital morphology.
    Simmons LW; House CM; Hunt J; García-González F
    Curr Biol; 2009 Sep; 19(17):1442-6. PubMed ID: 19664925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Heritable variation of sex pheromone composition and the potential for evolution of resistance to pheromone-based control of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Svensson GP; Ryne C; Löfstedt C
    J Chem Ecol; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1447-61. PubMed ID: 12199506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.