137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30759181)
1. Optimizing the bioenergy water footprint by selecting SRC willow canopy phenotypes: regional scenario simulations.
Richard B; Richter GM; Cerasuolo M; Shield I
Ann Bot; 2019 Oct; 124(4):531-542. PubMed ID: 30759181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioenergy crop production and carbon sequestration potential under changing climate and land use: A case study in the upper River Taw catchment in southwest England.
Dixit PN; Richter GM; Coleman K; Collins AL
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Nov; 900():166390. PubMed ID: 37597557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A physiological and biophysical model of coppice willow (Salix spp.) production yields for the contiguous USA in current and future climate scenarios.
Wang D; Jaiswal D; LeBauer DS; Wertin TM; Bollero GA; Leakey AD; Long SP
Plant Cell Environ; 2015 Sep; 38(9):1850-65. PubMed ID: 25963097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Landscape patterns of bioenergy in a changing climate: implications for crop allocation and land-use competition.
Graves RA; Pearson SM; Turner MG
Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 27209792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a sink-source interaction model for the growth of short-rotation coppice willow and in silico exploration of genotype×environment effects.
Cerasuolo M; Richter GM; Richard B; Cunniff J; Girbau S; Shield I; Purdy S; Karp A
J Exp Bot; 2016 Feb; 67(3):961-77. PubMed ID: 26663471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States.
Le PV; Kumar P; Drewry DT
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Sep; 108(37):15085-90. PubMed ID: 21876137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing genotype-environment-management interactions for maize farmers to adapt to climate change in different agro-ecological zones across China.
Zhang L; Zhang Z; Luo Y; Cao J; Li Z
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 728():138614. PubMed ID: 32344223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Climate-resilient agroforestry: physiological responses to climate change and engineering of crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) as a mitigation strategy.
Borland AM; Wullschleger SD; Weston DJ; Hartwell J; Tuskan GA; Yang X; Cushman JC
Plant Cell Environ; 2015 Sep; 38(9):1833-49. PubMed ID: 25366937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing nitrogen economy under drought: increased leaf nitrogen is an acclimation to water stress in willow (Salix spp.).
Weih M; Bonosi L; Ghelardini L; Rönnberg-Wästljung AC
Ann Bot; 2011 Nov; 108(7):1347-53. PubMed ID: 21896572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Yield and Water Quality Impacts of Field-Scale Integration of Willow into a Continuous Corn Rotation System.
Zumpf C; Ssegane H; Negri MC; Campbell P; Cacho J
J Environ Qual; 2017 Jul; 46(4):811-818. PubMed ID: 28783783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Joint linkage and association mapping of complex traits in shrub willow (Salix purpurea L.).
Carlson CH; Gouker FE; Crowell CR; Evans L; DiFazio SP; Smart CD; Smart LB
Ann Bot; 2019 Oct; 124(4):701-716. PubMed ID: 31008500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Climate Change Adaptation through the Water-Energy-Food Nexus in Southern Africa.
Mpandeli S; Naidoo D; Mabhaudhi T; Nhemachena C; Nhamo L; Liphadzi S; Hlahla S; Modi AT
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30347771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the effects of land management change on productivity, carbon and nutrient balance: Application of an Ensemble Modelling Approach to the upper River Taw observatory, UK.
Hassall KL; Coleman K; Dixit PN; Granger SJ; Zhang Y; Sharp RT; Wu L; Whitmore AP; Richter GM; Collins AL; Milne AE
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 824():153824. PubMed ID: 35182632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Models of reforestation productivity and carbon sequestration for land use and climate change adaptation planning in South Australia.
Hobbs TJ; Neumann CR; Meyer WS; Moon T; Bryan BA
J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():279-288. PubMed ID: 27372250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Valuation of ecosystem services of commercial shrub willow (Salix spp.) woody biomass crops.
Bressler A; Vidon P; Hirsch P; Volk T
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Apr; 189(4):137. PubMed ID: 28251452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Yield and spatial supply of bioenergy poplar and willow short-rotation coppice in the UK.
Aylott MJ; Casella E; Tubby I; Street NR; Smith P; Taylor G
New Phytol; 2008; 178(2):358-370. PubMed ID: 18331429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Climate impacts on European agriculture and water management in the context of adaptation and mitigation--the importance of an integrated approach.
Falloon P; Betts R
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Nov; 408(23):5667-87. PubMed ID: 19501386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential impacts on ecosystem services of land use transitions to second-generation bioenergy crops in GB.
Milner S; Holland RA; Lovett A; Sunnenberg G; Hastings A; Smith P; Wang S; Taylor G
Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2016 Mar; 8(2):317-333. PubMed ID: 27547244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the accuracy of crop production and water requirement calculations: Process-based crop modeling at daily, semi-weekly, and weekly time steps for integrated assessments.
Ammar ME; Davies EGR
J Environ Manage; 2019 May; 238():460-472. PubMed ID: 30877939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SWAT-MODSIM-PSO optimization of multi-crop planning in the Karkheh River Basin, Iran, under the impacts of climate change.
Fereidoon M; Koch M
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():502-516. PubMed ID: 29486443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]