168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30759291)
1. The Urodynamics and Survival Outcomes of Different Methods of Dissecting the Inferior Hypogastric Plexus in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy of Type C: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 30759291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification and injury to the inferior hypogastric plexus in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Li L; Bi Y; Wang L; Mao X; Kraemer B; Lang J; Cui Q; Wu M
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13260. PubMed ID: 31519975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres.
Yin S; Ma SN; Zhang YQ; Shi TY; Xiang LB; Ren YL; Zang RY
Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):380-386. PubMed ID: 30217291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nerve-sparing class III-IV radical hysterectomy: urodynamic study and surgical technique.
Maneschi F; Ianiri P; Sarno M; Gagliardi F; Panici PB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 May; 22(4):675-80. PubMed ID: 22367368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Preliminary study of nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Sun L; Wu LY; Zhang WH; Li XG; Song Y; Zhang X
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 31(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 20021949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nerve-Sparing Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Critical Steps.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Bradbury M; Pérez-Benavente A; Franco-Camps S; Gil-Moreno A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1144-1145. PubMed ID: 29432901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes.
Liang Z; Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 20673971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study.
Kim HS; Kim TH; Suh DH; Kim SY; Kim MA; Jeong CW; Hong KS; Song YS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):1987-95. PubMed ID: 25465377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.
Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
