These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30759314)

  • 1. When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies.
    Egolf A; Hartmann C; Siegrist M
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1546-1559. PubMed ID: 30759314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust.
    Siegrist M; Cousin ME; Kastenholz H; Wiek A
    Appetite; 2007 Sep; 49(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 17442455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat.
    Siegrist M; Sütterlin B; Hartmann C
    Meat Sci; 2018 May; 139():213-219. PubMed ID: 29459297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived naturalness, disgust, trust and food neophobia as predictors of cultured meat acceptance in ten countries.
    Siegrist M; Hartmann C
    Appetite; 2020 Dec; 155():104814. PubMed ID: 32783971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
    Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Risk-Benefit Perception and Trust on Medical Technology Acceptance in Relation to Drug and Device Lag: A Tripartite Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Todaka K; Kishimoto J; Ikeda M; Ikeda K; Yamamoto H
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2018 Sep; 52(5):629-640. PubMed ID: 29714546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies.
    Siegrist M; Hartmann C
    Nat Food; 2020 Jun; 1(6):343-350. PubMed ID: 37128090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disgust sensitivity, obesity stigma, and gender: contamination psychology predicts weight bias for women, not men.
    Lieberman DL; Tybur JM; Latner JD
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2012 Sep; 20(9):1803-14. PubMed ID: 21836644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Food made with edible insects": Exploring the social representation of entomophagy where it is unfamiliar.
    Bisconsin-Júnior A; Rodrigues H; Behrens JH; da Silva MAAP; Mariutti LRB
    Appetite; 2022 Jun; 173():106001. PubMed ID: 35306098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No Way, That's Gross! How Public Exposure Therapy Can Overcome Disgust Preventing Consumer Adoption of Sustainable Food Alternatives.
    Koch JA; Bolderdijk JW; van Ittersum K
    Foods; 2021 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 34203678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food disgust sensitivity influences the perception of food hazards: Results from longitudinal and cross-cultural studies.
    Siegrist M; Bearth A; Hartmann C
    Appetite; 2020 Oct; 153():104742. PubMed ID: 32422172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.
    Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25928741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of perceived naturalness for acceptance of food additives and cultured meat.
    Siegrist M; Sütterlin B
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():320-326. PubMed ID: 28315418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of information content on acceptance of cultured meat in a tasting context.
    Rolland NCM; Markus CR; Post MJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231176. PubMed ID: 32298291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advanced biopolymer-based edible coating technologies for food preservation and packaging.
    Wibowo C; Salsabila S; Muna A; Rusliman D; Wasisto HS
    Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2024 Jan; 23(1):e13275. PubMed ID: 38284604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature.
    Vandermoere F; Blanchemanche S; Bieberstein A; Marette S; Roosen J
    Public Underst Sci; 2011 Mar; 20(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 21657134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Nanotechnology and food safety].
    De Ariño Otxoa A
    Nutr Hosp; 2018 Jun; 35(Spec No4):146-149. PubMed ID: 30070138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Food Technology Neophobia Scales in cross-national context: Consumers' acceptance of food technologies between Chinese and New Zealand.
    Wang K; Cong L; Mirosa M; Hou Y; Bremer P
    J Food Sci; 2023 Aug; 88(8):3551-3561. PubMed ID: 37458297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China.
    Hu L; Liu R; Zhang W; Zhang T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33096931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional properties and applications of edible films made of milk proteins.
    Chen H
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Nov; 78(11):2563-83. PubMed ID: 8747343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.