These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30760059)

  • 1. Universal cervical length screening with a cervicometer to prevent preterm birth <34 weeks: a decision and economic analysis.
    McCurdy RJ; Baxter JK
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Nov; 33(21):3670-3679. PubMed ID: 30760059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm birth: an update.
    Werner EF; Hamel MS; Orzechowski K; Berghella V; Thung SF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):554.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26071914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of cervical length screening and progesterone treatment to prevent spontaneous preterm delivery in Sweden.
    Wikström T; Kuusela P; Jacobsson B; Hagberg H; Lindgren P; Svensson M; Wennerholm UB; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 59(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 35195310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a cervicometer compared to transvaginal ultrasound in identifying women with a short cervical length: a multicenter study.
    Baxter JK; Adair CD; Paidas MJ; Hoffman MK; Kivel FJ; Cebrik D; Ross MG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Werner EF; Han CS; Pettker CM; Buhimschi CS; Copel JA; Funai EF; Thung SF
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 21157771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention.
    Miller ES; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):546.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23954533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of universal routine sonographic cervical-length measurement at 19 to 25 weeks' gestation.
    Leshno M; Meiri H; Maymon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 May; 6(5S):101313. PubMed ID: 38387505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of history-indicated cerclage vs cervical length assessment for prevention of preterm birth.
    Nehme L; Huang JC; Abuhamad A; Saade G; Kawakita T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):674.e1-674.e9. PubMed ID: 37352907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of risk-based screening for cervical length to prevent preterm birth.
    Einerson BD; Grobman WA; Miller ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):100.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26880732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Is universal screening for cervical length among singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm birth justified?].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Dec; 45(10):1337-1345. PubMed ID: 28166925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time required to complete transvaginal cervical length in women receiving universal cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention.
    Masters HR; Warshak C; Sinclair S; Rountree S; DeFranco E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(16):3114-3118. PubMed ID: 32862742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimates of avoided costs attributed to a short cervix screening program to prevent preterm birth from the perspective of the Unified Health System (SUS).
    Silva TV; Borovac-Pinheiro A; Pacagnella RC
    Rev Saude Publica; 2023; 57():87. PubMed ID: 37971181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effectiveness of a new cervicometer in evaluating the risk of preterm delivery].
    Porcaro G; Clerici G; Romanelli M; Giulietti E; Antonelli C; Babucci G; Di Renzo GC
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Jun; 65(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 23689176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis.
    Cahill AG; Odibo AO; Caughey AB; Stamilio DM; Hassan SS; Macones GA; Romero R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):548.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20079888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A universal transvaginal cervical length screening program for preterm birth prevention.
    Orzechowski KM; Boelig RC; Baxter JK; Berghella V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 124(3):520-525. PubMed ID: 25162252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal cervical length scans to prevent prematurity in twins: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gordon MC; McKenna DS; Stewart TL; Howard BC; Foster KF; Higby K; Cypher RL; Barth WH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):277.e1-277.e7. PubMed ID: 26363481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Universal cervical length screening and risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hessami K; D'Alberti E; Mascio DD; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 May; 6(5S):101343. PubMed ID: 38479489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A universal mid-trimester transvaginal cervical length screening program and its associated reduced preterm birth rate.
    Son M; Grobman WA; Ayala NK; Miller ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):365.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26928150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of universal cervical length screening: importance of progesterone efficacy.
    Jain S; Kilgore M; Edwards RK; Owen J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):101.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26821336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early universal use of oral progesterone for prevention of preterm births in singleton pregnancy (SINPRO study): protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Cheung KW; Seto MTY; Ng EHY
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):121. PubMed ID: 32000820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.