BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3076046)

  • 1. Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
    Mazess RB; Barden HS
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(5-6):197-203. PubMed ID: 3076046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Nuti R; Martini G; Righi G; Frediani B; Turchetti V
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
    Pouilles JM; Tremollieres F; Todorovsky N; Ribot C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Sep; 6(9):997-1002. PubMed ID: 1789144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
    Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone densitometry.
    Chun KJ
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 May; 41(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 21440697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osteoporosis in lung transplantation candidates with end-stage pulmonary disease.
    Shane E; Silverberg SJ; Donovan D; Papadopoulos A; Staron RB; Addesso V; Jorgesen B; McGregor C; Schulman L
    Am J Med; 1996 Sep; 101(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 8873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of bone mineral density with dual x-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis in children with bladder augmentation.
    Abeş M; Sarihan H; Madenci E
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Feb; 38(2):230-2. PubMed ID: 12596110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements: dual-energy X-rays versus gadolinium 153.
    Russell-Aulet M; Wang J; Thornton J; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Apr; 6(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 1858524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis.
    Lewiecki EM
    Minerva Med; 2005 Oct; 96(5):317-30. PubMed ID: 16227947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
    Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
    Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total body, spine, and femur dual X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
    Nuti R; Martini G; Gennari C
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Dec; 53(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 8293352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminative ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry site selection in identifying patients with osteoporotic fractures.
    Arabi A; Baddoura R; Awada H; Khoury N; Haddad S; Ayoub G; El-Hajj Fuleihan G
    Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 17223616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
    Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.
    Rosenthal DI; Tosteson AN
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):31-3. PubMed ID: 2517698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical aspects and clinical interpretation of bone mineral measurements.
    Wahner H
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):27-30. PubMed ID: 2517697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Larcos G; Wahner HW
    J Nucl Med; 1991 Nov; 32(11):2101-6. PubMed ID: 1941145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of regional bone mineral measurements obtained from total-body scans.
    LeBlanc AD; Schneider VS; Engelbretson DA; Evans HJ
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2295939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip.
    Holbrook TL; Barrett-Connor E; Klauber M; Sartoris D
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Nov; 49(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 1782570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Measurement of bone mineral density is unnecessary for monitoring of bisphosphonate treatment].
    Nishida A; Ito M
    Clin Calcium; 2011 Jan; 21(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 21187605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
    Christensen DL; Nappo KE; Wolfe JA; Wade SM; Brooks DI; Potter BK; Forsberg JA; Tintle SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 477(4):850-860. PubMed ID: 30811362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.