These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3076046)

  • 1. Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
    Mazess RB; Barden HS
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1988; 77(5-6):197-203. PubMed ID: 3076046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Nuti R; Martini G; Righi G; Frediani B; Turchetti V
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
    Pouilles JM; Tremollieres F; Todorovsky N; Ribot C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Sep; 6(9):997-1002. PubMed ID: 1789144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
    Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone densitometry.
    Chun KJ
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 May; 41(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 21440697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Osteoporosis in lung transplantation candidates with end-stage pulmonary disease.
    Shane E; Silverberg SJ; Donovan D; Papadopoulos A; Staron RB; Addesso V; Jorgesen B; McGregor C; Schulman L
    Am J Med; 1996 Sep; 101(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 8873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of bone mineral density with dual x-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis in children with bladder augmentation.
    Abeş M; Sarihan H; Madenci E
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Feb; 38(2):230-2. PubMed ID: 12596110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements: dual-energy X-rays versus gadolinium 153.
    Russell-Aulet M; Wang J; Thornton J; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Apr; 6(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 1858524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis.
    Lewiecki EM
    Minerva Med; 2005 Oct; 96(5):317-30. PubMed ID: 16227947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
    Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
    Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total body, spine, and femur dual X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
    Nuti R; Martini G; Gennari C
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Dec; 53(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 8293352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminative ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry site selection in identifying patients with osteoporotic fractures.
    Arabi A; Baddoura R; Awada H; Khoury N; Haddad S; Ayoub G; El-Hajj Fuleihan G
    Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 17223616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
    Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
    J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.
    Rosenthal DI; Tosteson AN
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):31-3. PubMed ID: 2517698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical aspects and clinical interpretation of bone mineral measurements.
    Wahner H
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104 Suppl(Suppl):27-30. PubMed ID: 2517697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Larcos G; Wahner HW
    J Nucl Med; 1991 Nov; 32(11):2101-6. PubMed ID: 1941145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of regional bone mineral measurements obtained from total-body scans.
    LeBlanc AD; Schneider VS; Engelbretson DA; Evans HJ
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2295939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip.
    Holbrook TL; Barrett-Connor E; Klauber M; Sartoris D
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Nov; 49(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 1782570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Measurement of bone mineral density is unnecessary for monitoring of bisphosphonate treatment].
    Nishida A; Ito M
    Clin Calcium; 2011 Jan; 21(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 21187605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
    Christensen DL; Nappo KE; Wolfe JA; Wade SM; Brooks DI; Potter BK; Forsberg JA; Tintle SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 477(4):850-860. PubMed ID: 30811362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.