These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3076111)

  • 1. Cytobrush washings and false-negative reports.
    Gupta RK; Naran S; Fauck R; Buchanan A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1988; 4(4):360-1. PubMed ID: 3076111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
    Noel ML
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Papanicolaou smear cell recovery techniques used by primary care physicians.
    Clement KD; Christenson PD
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1990; 3(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 2248091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sailing under wrong colors; false-negative results of cervix cytology].
    Lammes FB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1979 Oct; 123(43):1857-9. PubMed ID: 390407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush: comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Pfenninger JL
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Jun; 37(6):A32. PubMed ID: 1619600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Pap smear quality with anatomical spatula and convenience (spatula-cytobrush) methods: a single blind clinical trial.
    Abdali K; Soleimani M; Khajehei M; Tabatabaee HR; Komar PV; Montazer NR
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(6):1769-72. PubMed ID: 21338231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated cytologic screening devices and malpractice liability.
    Skoumal SM; Cohen MB
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Aug; 17(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 9258613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the Cytobrush as an aid in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test.
    Gosewehr JA; Julian TM; O'Connell BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):440-3. PubMed ID: 1876381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cellularity of liquid-based, thin-layer cervical cytology.
    Zardawi IM
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(5):943. PubMed ID: 14526685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NeoPath, Inc. NeoPath AutoPap 300 Automatic Pap Screener System.
    Patten SF; Lee JS; Nelson AC
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8604574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use effectiveness of the Cytobrush in the primary care setting.
    Cauthen DB; Cullison M; Symm B; Peterson RF
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 1496891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposed guidelines for secondary screening (rescreening) instruments for gynecologic cytology. Intersociety Working Group for Cytology Technologies.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 9479352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Planning, execution and results of automated vaginal cytological diagnosis].
    Naujoks H; Sprenger E
    Gynakologe; 1990 Dec; 23(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 2279707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic.
    Mandal D; Ray TK; Richmond SJ; Goorney BP; Haye KR
    Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between Cytobrush and Papaplast in sampling vaginal smears.
    Hjersing M; Holm E; Larsson G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):595-9. PubMed ID: 1785277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples.
    Boon ME; Zeppa P; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Kok LP
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 1994636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.