139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30761334)
1. Dataset for evaluation of threescoring systems for forecasting the clinical outcomes of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) - Ahvaz, Iran.
Saeidseyedian S; Shayesteh AA; Beyranvandi F
Data Brief; 2018 Dec; 21():2526-2530. PubMed ID: 30761334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pillcam ESO(®) is more accurate than clinical scoring systems in risk stratifying emergency room patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Gutkin E; Shalomov A; Hussain SA; Kim SH; Cortes R; Gray S; Judeh H; Pollack S; Rubin M
Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2013 May; 6(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 23634183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blatchford score is a useful tool for predicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ahn S; Lim KS; Lee YS; Lee JL
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1288-94. PubMed ID: 23432611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Two Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Taiwanese Population.
Wang CH; Hung MS; Wu KH; Chen YC
J Acute Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):115-121. PubMed ID: 32995182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review.
Ebrahimi Bakhtavar H; Morteza Bagi HR; Rahmani F; Shahsavari Nia K; Ettehadi A
Emerg (Tehran); 2017; 5(1):e36. PubMed ID: 28286843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Rockall and Blatchford scores to assess outcome of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy.
Lee MS; Cheng CL; Liu NJ; Tsou YK; Tang JH; Lin CH; Sung KF; Lee CS
Hepatogastroenterology; 2013; 60(128):1990-7. PubMed ID: 24719939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing AIMS65 Score With MEWS, qSOFA Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Lai YC; Hung MS; Chen YH; Chen YC
J Acute Med; 2018 Dec; 8(4):154-167. PubMed ID: 32995218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incremental value of upper endoscopy for triage of patients with acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhage.
Gralnek IM; Dulai GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Jul; 60(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15229418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relevance of surgery in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Dango S; Beißbarth T; Weiss E; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Raddatz D; Ellenrieder V; Lotz J; Ghadimi BM; Beham A
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 May; 402(3):509-519. PubMed ID: 28091770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
