139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30761334)
21. The Clinical and Endoscopic Profiles of Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (UGIB) and the Role of the Rockall Scoring System in Predicting Adverse Outcomes.
Anshul ; Singh N; Pahuja H; Kumar V; Popli BP; Kumar S
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40418. PubMed ID: 37456449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of scoring models for identifying the need for therapeutic intervention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A new prediction score model for Japanese patients.
Iino C; Mikami T; Igarashi T; Aihara T; Ishii K; Sakamoto J; Tono H; Fukuda S
Dig Endosc; 2016 Nov; 28(7):714-721. PubMed ID: 27061908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Antithrombotic drugs and non-variceal bleeding outcomes and risk scoring systems: comparison of Glasgow Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores.
Taha AS; McCloskey C; Craigen T; Angerson WJ
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 7(4):257-263. PubMed ID: 28839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 3 scoring systems to predict mortality from unstable upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.
Hsu SC; Chen CY; Weng YM; Chen SY; Lin CC; Chen JC
Am J Emerg Med; 2014 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 24560395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Mokhtare M; Bozorgi V; Agah S; Nikkhah M; Faghihi A; Boghratian A; Shalbaf N; Khanlari A; Seifmanesh H
Clin Exp Gastroenterol; 2016; 9():337-343. PubMed ID: 27826205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of computed tomography findings with clinical risks factors for endoscopic therapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding cases.
Jono F; Iida H; Fujita K; Kaai M; Kanoshima K; Ohkuma K; Nonaka T; Ida T; Kusakabe A; Nakamura A; Koyama S; Nakajima A; Inamori M
J Clin Biochem Nutr; 2019 Sep; 65(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 31592208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?
Monteiro S; Gonçalves TC; Magalhães J; Cotter J
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol; 2016 Feb; 7(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 26909231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Severity Triage: Locally Derived Score May Outperform Existing Scoring Systems.
Chaikitamnuaychok R; Patumanond J
Gastroenterology Res; 2015 Apr; 8(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 27785294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Profile and outcome of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding presenting to urban emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Tanzania.
Rajan SS; Sawe HR; Iyullu AJ; Kaale DA; Olambo NA; Mfinanga JA; Weber EJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):212. PubMed ID: 31823741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of risk scoring for the outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Chan JCH; Ayaru L
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 28839577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of risk in a mixed patient group including variceal and nonvariceal haemorrhage.
Lahiff C; Shields W; Cretu I; Mahmud N; McKiernan S; Norris S; Silke B; Reynolds JV; O'Toole D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 24(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 22113209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Tuncer H; Yardan T; Akdemir HU; Ayyildiz T
Pak J Med Sci; 2018; 34(3):649-654. PubMed ID: 30034432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice.
Waddell KM; Stanley AJ
Hosp Pract (1995); 2015; 43(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 26536295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the performance of risk scoring systems for tumor bleeding in patients with inoperable gastric cancer.
Kim YI; Choi IJ; Lee JY; Kim CG; Kim HK; Park YL
Endoscopy; 2020 May; 52(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 32097976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical Performance of Prediction Rules and Nasogastric Lavage for the Evaluation of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Dakik HK; Srygley FD; Chiu ST; Chow SC; Fisher DA
Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2017; 2017():3171697. PubMed ID: 28246528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Accuracy of Pre-Endoscopic Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Upper GI Bleeding and No Endoscopy Performed.
Cazacu SM; Alexandru DO; Statie RC; Iordache S; Ungureanu BS; Iovănescu VF; Popa P; Sacerdoțianu VM; Neagoe CD; Florescu MM
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
