146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30761357)
1. Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: A systematic review.
Sunderam S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2018 Aug; 6():102-119. PubMed ID: 30761357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance -
United States, 2013.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice.
Stillman RJ; Richter KS; Banks NK; Graham JR
Fertil Steril; 2009 Dec; 92(6):1895-906. PubMed ID: 18976755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risks of spontaneously and IVF-conceived singleton and twin pregnancies differ, requiring reassessment of statistical premises favoring elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
Gleicher N; Kushnir VA; Barad DH
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2016 May; 14(1):25. PubMed ID: 27142226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.
Tobias T; Sharara FI; Franasiak JM; Heiser PW; Pinckney-Clark E
Fertil Res Pract; 2016; 2():1. PubMed ID: 28620526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates.
Criniti A; Thyer A; Chow G; Lin P; Klein N; Soules M
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1613-9. PubMed ID: 16359954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience].
Leniaud L; Poncelet C; Porcher R; Martin-Pont B; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Wolf JP; Sifer C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Feb; 36(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 18255330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.
Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.
Stillman RJ; Richter KS; Jones HW
Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2599-607. PubMed ID: 23904468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention.
Pinborg A
Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(6):575-93. PubMed ID: 16123055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review.
Leese B; Denton J
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2010 Mar; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20141337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies.
Pinborg A; Ortoft G; Loft A; Rasmussen SC; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 25358346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
