BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30761699)

  • 1. Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.
    Harrison JD; Auerbach AD; Anderson W; Fagan M; Carnie M; Hanson C; Banta J; Symczak G; Robinson E; Schnipper J; Wong C; Weiss R
    Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 30761699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.
    Hoekstra F; Mrklas KJ; Khan M; McKay RC; Vis-Dunbar M; Sibley KM; Nguyen T; Graham ID; ; Gainforth HL
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 32450919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.
    Parry M; Bjørnnes AK; Toupin-April K; Najam A; Wells D; Sivakumar A; Richards DP; Ceroni T; Park M; Ellis AK; Gilron I; Marlin S
    Patient; 2020 Dec; 13(6):745-756. PubMed ID: 33026639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.
    Boaz A; Hanney S; Borst R; O'Shea A; Kok M
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 29996848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.
    Salerno J; Coleman KJ; Jones F; Peters ES
    Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 59():37-43. PubMed ID: 33894383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.
    Khayatzadeh-Mahani A; Wittevrongel K; Petermann L; Graham ID; Zwicker JD
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Apr; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 32303228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach.
    Hoekstra F; Mrklas KJ; Sibley KM; Nguyen T; Vis-Dunbar M; Neilson CJ; Crockett LK; Gainforth HL; Graham ID
    Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):217. PubMed ID: 30497527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Xyrichis A; Iliopoulou K; Mackintosh NJ; Bench S; Terblanche M; Philippou J; Sandall J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Feb; 2(2):CD012876. PubMed ID: 33599282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engaging stakeholders in pharmacoepidemiology research: Current state and recommendations.
    Camelo Castillo W; Heath N; Kim J; Yang K; Ritchey ME; dosReis S; Santanello N; West SL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Jun; 28(6):766-776. PubMed ID: 31050092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a stakeholder advisory board for an adolescent mental health randomized clinical trial.
    Hoke AM; Rosen P; Pileggi F; Molinari A; Sekhar DL
    Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Mar; 9(1):17. PubMed ID: 36978148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.
    Lauzon-Schnittka J; Audette-Chapdelaine S; Boutin D; Wilhelmy C; Auger AM; Brodeur M
    Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Oct; 8(1):55. PubMed ID: 36192817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Political economy analysis of universal health coverage and health financing reforms in low- and middle-income countries: the role of stakeholder engagement in the research process.
    Loffreda G; Bello K; Kiendrébéogo JA; Selenou I; Ahmed MAA; Dossou JP; Witter S; Bertone MP
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2021 Dec; 19(1):143. PubMed ID: 34895251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?
    Boudes M; Robinson P; Bertelsen N; Brooke N; Hoos A; Boutin M; Geissler J; Sargeant I
    Health Expect; 2018 Dec; 21(6):1035-1045. PubMed ID: 29858529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.
    Mallidou AA; Frisch N; Doyle-Waters MM; MacLeod MLP; Ward J; Atherton P
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):101. PubMed ID: 30025543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stakeholder engagement in European brain research: Experiences of the Lifebrain consortium.
    Budin-Ljøsne I; Friedman BB; Baaré WFC; Bartrés-Faz D; Carver RB; Drevon CA; Ebmeier KP; Fjell AM; Ghisletta P; Henson RN; Kievit R; Madsen KS; Nawijn L; Suri S; Solé-Padullés C; Walhovd KB; Zsoldos E
    Health Expect; 2023 Jun; 26(3):1318-1326. PubMed ID: 36989126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD.
    Bell-Brown A; Watabayashi K; Kreizenbeck K; Ramsey SD; Bansal A; Barlow WE; Lyman GH; Hershman DL; Mercurio AM; Segarra-Vazquez B; Kurttila F; Myers JS; Golenski JD; Johnson J; Erwin RL; Walia G; Crawford J; Sullivan SD
    J Comp Eff Res; 2022 Dec; 11(18):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 36378570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research: a scoping review protocol.
    Chudyk AM; Waldman C; Horrill T; Demczuk L; Shimmin C; Stoddard R; Hickes S; Schultz ASH
    Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():28. PubMed ID: 30214822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.
    Bird M; Ouellette C; Whitmore C; Li L; Nair K; McGillion MH; Yost J; Banfield L; Campbell E; Carroll SL
    Health Expect; 2020 Jun; 23(3):523-539. PubMed ID: 32157777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.