These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30761899)

  • 1. Suspension Trapping (S-Trap) Is Compatible with Typical Protein Extraction Buffers and Detergents for Bottom-Up Proteomics.
    Elinger D; Gabashvili A; Levin Y
    J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1441-1445. PubMed ID: 30761899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies.
    Ludwig KR; Schroll MM; Hummon AB
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2480-2490. PubMed ID: 29754492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of SPEED, S-Trap, and In-Solution-Based Sample Preparation Methods for Mass Spectrometry in Kidney Tissue and Plasma.
    Templeton EM; Pilbrow AP; Kleffmann T; Pickering JW; Rademaker MT; Scott NJA; Ellmers LJ; Charles CJ; Endre ZH; Richards AM; Cameron VA; Lassé M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Mar; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 37047281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecological Monitoring and Omics: A Comprehensive Comparison of Workflows for Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomics of Fish (
    Nissa MU; Pinto N; Varshnay A; Goswami M; Srivastava S
    OMICS; 2022 Sep; 26(9):489-503. PubMed ID: 36036978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments.
    Hughes CS; Moggridge S; Müller T; Sorensen PH; Morin GB; Krijgsveld J
    Nat Protoc; 2019 Jan; 14(1):68-85. PubMed ID: 30464214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Small Molecular Additives and Their Effects on Peptide/Protein Identification.
    Gao J; Zhong S; Zhou Y; He H; Peng S; Zhu Z; Liu X; Zheng J; Xu B; Zhou H
    Anal Chem; 2017 Jun; 89(11):5784-5792. PubMed ID: 28530406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample Preparation by Easy Extraction and Digestion (SPEED) - A Universal, Rapid, and Detergent-free Protocol for Proteomics Based on Acid Extraction.
    Doellinger J; Schneider A; Hoeller M; Lasch P
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 19(1):209-222. PubMed ID: 31754045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
    Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
    Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suspension trapping (STrap) sample preparation method for bottom-up proteomics analysis.
    Zougman A; Selby PJ; Banks RE
    Proteomics; 2014 May; 14(9):1006-0. PubMed ID: 24678027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Straightforward Protocol for Gel-Free Proteomic Analysis of Adipose Tissue.
    Pasing Y; Schniers A; Hansen T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():289-296. PubMed ID: 28980277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics.
    Muller L; Fornecker L; Chion M; Van Dorsselaer A; Cianférani S; Rabilloud T; Carapito C
    Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):8260. PubMed ID: 29844437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics; from Proteomes to Peptides.
    Rogers JC; Bomgarden RD
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():43-62. PubMed ID: 27975212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimizing technical variation during sample preparation prior to label-free quantitative mass spectrometry.
    Scheerlinck E; Dhaenens M; Van Soom A; Peelman L; De Sutter P; Van Steendam K; Deforce D
    Anal Biochem; 2015 Dec; 490():14-9. PubMed ID: 26302362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of human dendritic cell sample preparation for mass spectrometry-based proteomic studies.
    Zhang Y; Bottinelli D; Lisacek F; Luban J; Strambio-De-Castillia C; Varesio E; Hopfgartner G
    Anal Biochem; 2015 Sep; 484():40-50. PubMed ID: 25983236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein solubilization: attend to the choice of lysis buffer.
    Peach M; Marsh N; Macphee DJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 869():37-47. PubMed ID: 22585475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plasma proteome coverage is increased by unique peptide recovery from sodium deoxycholate precipitate.
    Serra A; Zhu H; Gallart-Palau X; Park JE; Ho HH; Tam JP; Sze SK
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Mar; 408(7):1963-73. PubMed ID: 26804737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A High-Efficiency Cellular Extraction System for Biological Proteomics.
    Dhabaria A; Cifani P; Reed C; Steen H; Kentsis A
    J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3403-8. PubMed ID: 26153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimized Suspension Trapping Method for Phosphoproteomics Sample Preparation.
    Wang F; Veth T; Kuipers M; Altelaar M; Stecker KE
    Anal Chem; 2023 Jun; 95(25):9471-9479. PubMed ID: 37319171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of protein characterization using In solution and S-Trap digestion methods for proteomics.
    Bang G; Lee H; Kim H; Han EH; Park YH; Kim JY
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2022 Jan; 589():197-203. PubMed ID: 34922203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative Assessment of Urea In-Solution Lys-C/Trypsin Digestions Reveals Superior Performance at Room Temperature over Traditional Proteolysis at 37 °C.
    Betancourt LH; Sanchez A; Pla I; Kuras M; Zhou Q; Andersson R; Marko-Varga G
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2556-2561. PubMed ID: 29812944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.