These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30762378)

  • 21. Evaluating Model-Data Fit by Comparing Parametric and Nonparametric Item Response Functions: Application of a Tukey-Hann Procedure.
    Jennings JK; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 28453499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An extension of a bayesian approach to detect differential item functioning.
    Sinharay S
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 23816593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [An item response model for the experimental design].
    Shojima K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Feb; 73(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 12728703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Careless responding in crowdsourced alcohol research: A systematic review and meta-analysis of practices and prevalence.
    Jones A; Earnest J; Adam M; Clarke R; Yates J; Pennington CR
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2022 Aug; 30(4):381-399. PubMed ID: 35130007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detecting random responders with infrequency scales using an error-balancing threshold.
    Kim DS; McCabe CJ; Yamasaki BL; Louie KA; King KM
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1960-1970. PubMed ID: 28936811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data.
    Sijtsma K; van der Ark LA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):137-158. PubMed ID: 27958642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identifying careless responses in survey data.
    Meade AW; Craig SB
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):437-55. PubMed ID: 22506584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.
    Fukuhara H; Paek I
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 26784379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A procedure for dimensionality analyses of response data from various test designs.
    Zhang J
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):37-58. PubMed ID: 25107517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.
    Wicks P; McCaffrey S; Goodwin K; Black R; Hoole M; Heywood J
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e12075. PubMed ID: 30681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship among design parameters for statistical power between continuous and binomial outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Chan W
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):179-195. PubMed ID: 29975081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models.
    Edwards MC; Houts CR; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):138-149. PubMed ID: 28368176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does Instruction Affect the Underlying Dimensionality of a Kinesiology Test?
    Bezruczko N; Frank E; Perkins K
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):393-415. PubMed ID: 28009588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the Sampling Performance of Exploratory and Cross-Validated DETECT Procedure with Imperfect Models.
    Zopluoglu C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):632-44. PubMed ID: 26717123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Practical considerations for evaluating reliability in ambulatory assessment studies.
    Calamia M
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Mar; 31(3):285-291. PubMed ID: 30802114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Supporting construct validity of the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire using Linear Logistic Test Models.
    Adroher ND; Tennant A
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1627-1639. PubMed ID: 30852765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Measuring Perceived Support for Autonomy in a Virtual Care Setting.
    Smit ES; Dima AL; Immerzeel SAM; van den Putte B; Williams GC
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e155. PubMed ID: 28483743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regression-based techniques for statistical decision making in single-case designs.
    Manolov R; Arnau J; Solanas A; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):1026-32. PubMed ID: 21044548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Goodness-of-fit test for monotone proportional subdistribution hazards assumptions based on weighted residuals.
    Boher JM; Filleron T; Giorgi R; Kramar A; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):362-377. PubMed ID: 27790725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.