656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30763518)
1. A single, open access journal may prevent the primary publishing problems in the life sciences.
Lewis P; Depp C
Account Res; 2019 Aug; 26(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 30763518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.
Shamseer L; Moher D; Maduekwe O; Turner L; Barbour V; Burch R; Clark J; Galipeau J; Roberts J; Shea BJ
BMC Med; 2017 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 28298236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.
O'Kelly F; Fernandez N; Koyle MA
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):159.e1-159.e7. PubMed ID: 30867116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Open-access Mega-journals in Health and Life Sciences: What Every Researcher needs to know about this Publishing Model.
Dinis-Oliveira RJ
Curr Drug Res Rev; 2022; 14(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 35139796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.
Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Gorin SV; Koroleva AM; Kitas GD
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1351-4. PubMed ID: 27510376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of Data Duplications in a Randomly Selected Pool of Life Science Publications.
Oksvold MP
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Apr; 22(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 26065681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences.
Bowman JD
Am J Pharm Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(10):176. PubMed ID: 25657363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. WASP: Is open access publishing the way forward? A review of the different ways in which research papers can be published.
Cuschieri S
Early Hum Dev; 2018 Jun; 121():54-57. PubMed ID: 29499986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions.
Schroter S; Tite L
J R Soc Med; 2006 Mar; 99(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16508053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Growth of Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Journals.
Kortlever JTP; Tran TTH; Ring D; Menendez ME
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jul; 477(7):1727-1735. PubMed ID: 31135548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers.
Bennett DM; Taylor DM
Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Jun; 15(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 12786648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.
Björk BC
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e115. PubMed ID: 22173122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual use research: investigation across multiple science disciplines.
Oltmann S
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Apr; 21(2):327-41. PubMed ID: 24671464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical journals in the Republic of Macedonia after the Second World War.
Polenakovic M; Danevska L
Prilozi; 2011; 32(2):11-31. PubMed ID: 22286612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The last bite was deadly--about responsibility in scientific publishing.
Pavlovic D; Usichenko TI; Lehmann C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2014; 57(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 24595128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.
Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J
Account Res; 2015; 22(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 25275622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do financial factors such as author page charges and industry funding impact on the nature of published research in infectious diseases?
Liyanage SS; Raina Macintyre C
Health Info Libr J; 2006 Sep; 23(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 16911128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true.
Edie AH; Conklin JL
Nurs Forum; 2019 Jul; 54(3):336-339. PubMed ID: 30802310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Website System for Communicating Psychological Science.
Diener E
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Jul; 12(4):684-689. PubMed ID: 28727962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
