These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30763551)

  • 1. The impact of dose rate on the linear no threshold hypothesis.
    Brooks AL
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():68-80. PubMed ID: 30763551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of dose-rate on risk from internally-deposited radionuclides and the potential need to separate dose-rate effectiveness factor (DREF) from the dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF).
    Brooks AL; Eberlein PE; Couch LA; Boecker BB
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):458-69. PubMed ID: 19820455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nuclear epidemiologic studies and the estimation of DREF.
    Hoel DG
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Apr; 94(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 29400635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a new dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF)? Some comments.
    Chadwick KH
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Jun; 37(2):422-433. PubMed ID: 28488593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The linear no-threshold dose-effect relation: is it relevant to radiation protection regulation?
    Nussbaum RH
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):291-9; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 9547496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for dose and dose rate effects in human and animal radiation studies.
    Little MP
    Ann ICRP; 2018 Oct; 47(3-4):97-112. PubMed ID: 29652168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose and dose-rate effects of ionizing radiation: a discussion in the light of radiological protection.
    Rühm W; Woloschak GE; Shore RE; Azizova TV; Grosche B; Niwa O; Akiba S; Ono T; Suzuki K; Iwasaki T; Ban N; Kai M; Clement CH; Bouffler S; Toma H; Hamada N
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2015 Nov; 54(4):379-401. PubMed ID: 26343037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy dependence of dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor for low-let radiations: potential importance to estimation of cancer risks and relationship to biological effectiveness.
    Trabalka JR; Kocher DC
    Health Phys; 2007 Jul; 93(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 17563489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of solid cancer in low dose-rate radiation epidemiological studies and the dose-rate effectiveness factor.
    Shore R; Walsh L; Azizova T; Rühm W
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1064-1078. PubMed ID: 28421857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new paradigms and modern molecular studies.
    Tharmalingam S; Sreetharan S; Brooks AL; Boreham DR
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():54-67. PubMed ID: 30763548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluating the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events in critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation.
    Brooks AL; Hoel DG; Preston RJ
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2016 Aug; 92(8):405-26. PubMed ID: 27266588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Preston RJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States.
    Siegel JA; Stabin MG
    Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing a scientific basis for radiation risk estimates: goal of the DOE Low Dose Research Program.
    Brooks AL
    Health Phys; 2003 Jul; 85(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 12852475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation.
    Elmore E; Lao XY; Kapadia R; Redpath JL
    Radiat Res; 2006 Dec; 166(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 17149982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion.
    Siegel JA; Pennington CW; Sacks B
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jan; 58(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27493264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the estimation of radiation-induced cancer risks from very low doses of radiation and how to communicate these risks.
    Mattsson S; Nilsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):17-21. PubMed ID: 25802468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations.
    Calabrese EJ
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():6-25. PubMed ID: 30763547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The LNT model for cancer induction is not supported by radiobiological data.
    Scott BR; Tharmalingam S
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():34-53. PubMed ID: 30763552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
    Averbeck D
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.