These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30763555)
1. Ionizing radiations epidemiology does not support the LNT model. Ricci PF; Tharmalingam S Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():128-140. PubMed ID: 30763555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resolving an Open Science-policy question: Should the LNT still be an omnibus regulatory assumption? Ricci PF; Calabrese EJ Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():153917. PubMed ID: 35189226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began. Calabrese EJ Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation? Averbeck D Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model. Breckow J Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. Calabrese EJ Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():6-25. PubMed ID: 30763547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Ionizing radiation]. Masse R C R Acad Sci III; 2000 Jul; 323(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 10983274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment. Calabrese EJ Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here? Mossman KL Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):279-84; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 9547494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT. Calabrese EJ Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Oncological disease: dimensions of the phenomenon and role ionizing radiation]. Taino G; Bordini L; Imbriani M G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2017 Nov; 39(2):124-130. PubMed ID: 29916603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach. Brenner DJ; Sachs RK Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new paradigms and modern molecular studies. Tharmalingam S; Sreetharan S; Brooks AL; Boreham DR Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():54-67. PubMed ID: 30763548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model. Scott BR Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Progress in low dose health risk research: Novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology. Averbeck D; Salomaa S; Bouffler S; Ottolenghi A; Smyth V; Sabatier L Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2018; 776():46-69. PubMed ID: 29807577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection. Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis. Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE C R Acad Sci III; 1999; 322(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 10196673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation? Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm. Okonkwo UC; Ohagwu CC; Aronu ME; Okafor CE; Idumah CI; Okokpujie IP; Chukwu NN; Chukwunyelu CE J Environ Radioact; 2022 Nov; 253-254():106984. PubMed ID: 36057228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era? Doss M J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]