These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30763596)

  • 1. Affective and metabolic responses to self-selected intensity cycle exercise in young men.
    Haile L; Goss FL; Andreacci JL; Nagle EF; Robertson RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Jun; 205():9-14. PubMed ID: 30763596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry.
    Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Donnelly MS; Martz WP; Robertson RJ
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Aug; 78(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9721003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preferred exertion across three common modes of exercise training.
    Glass SC; Chvala AM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2001 Nov; 15(4):474-9. PubMed ID: 11726259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterning of physiological and affective responses in older active adults during a maximal graded exercise test and self-selected exercise.
    Smith AE; Eston R; Tempest GD; Norton B; Parfitt G
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 Sep; 115(9):1855-66. PubMed ID: 25876526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-selected or imposed exercise? A different approach for affective comparisons.
    Oliveira BR; Deslandes AC; Nakamura FY; Viana BF; Santos TM
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(8):777-85. PubMed ID: 25356844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of rating of perceived exertion-based tests of physical working capacity.
    Mielke M; Housh TJ; Malek MH; Beck TW; Schmidt RJ; Johnson GO
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan; 22(1):293-302. PubMed ID: 18296989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Session perceived exertion and affective responses to self-selected and imposed cycle exercise of the same intensity in young men.
    Haile L; Goss FL; Robertson RJ; Andreacci JL; Gallagher M; Nagle EF
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2013 Jul; 113(7):1755-65. PubMed ID: 23412542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise.
    Robertson RJ; Goss FL; Dube J; Rutkowski J; Dupain M; Brennan C; Andreacci J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Jan; 36(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 14707775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exercise intensity prescription in obese individuals.
    Pinet BM; Prud'homme D; Gallant CA; Boulay P
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2008 Sep; 16(9):2088-95. PubMed ID: 18483474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy cost calculations for exercise prescription: an update.
    Swain DP
    Sports Med; 2000 Jul; 30(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10907754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Poorer positive affect in response to self-paced exercise among the obese.
    Elsangedy HM; Nascimento PHD; Machado DGS; Krinski K; Hardcastle SJ; DaSilva SG
    Physiol Behav; 2018 May; 189():32-39. PubMed ID: 29458113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exercise mode and gender comparisons of energy expenditure at self-selected intensities.
    Kravitz L; Robergs RA; Heyward VH; Wagner DR; Powers K
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Aug; 29(8):1028-35. PubMed ID: 9268959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulating intensity using perceived exertion during extended exercise periods.
    Kang J; Hoffman JR; Walker H; Chaloupka EC; Utter AC
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Jun; 89(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 12712344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Psychological and Physiological Responses to Imposed vs. Self-selected High-Intensity Interval Training.
    Kellogg E; Cantacessi C; McNamer O; Holmes H; von Bargen R; Ramirez R; Gallagher D; Vargas S; Santia B; Rodriguez K; Astorino TA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):2945-2952. PubMed ID: 29742746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of VO2 peak using OMNI Ratings of Perceived Exertion from a submaximal cycle exercise test.
    Mays RJ; Goss FL; Nagle EF; Gallagher M; Schafer MA; Kim KH; Robertson RJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Jun; 118(3):863-81. PubMed ID: 25068750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise sessions in adolescent girls: an observational study.
    Hamlyn-Williams CC; Freeman P; Parfitt G
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2014; 6():35. PubMed ID: 25285215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ratings of Perceived Exertion and Physiological Responses in Children During Exercise.
    Erichsen JM; Dykstra BJ; Hidde MC; Mahon AD
    Int J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 38(12):897-901. PubMed ID: 28934805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute physiological responses to recreational in-line skating in young adults.
    Orepic P; Mikulic P; Soric M; Ruzic L; Markovic G
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14 Suppl 1():S25-31. PubMed ID: 24444214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise.
    Utter AC; Robertson RJ; Green JM; Suminski RR; McAnulty SR; Nieman DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Oct; 36(10):1776-80. PubMed ID: 15595300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ratings of perceived exertion in braille: validity and reliability in production mode.
    Buckley JP; Eston RG; Sim J
    Br J Sports Med; 2000 Aug; 34(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 10953905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.