424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30764876)
1. Comparative analysis of the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating the histological features of endometrial cancer.
Yue W; Meng N; Wang J; Liu W; Wang X; Yan M; Han D; Cheng J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 30764876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging mono-exponential mode with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting pathological grades of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Cao J; Luo X; Zhou Z; Duan Y; Xiao L; Sun X; Shang Q; Gong X; Hou Z; Kong D; He B
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130():109195. PubMed ID: 32763475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating the histological grade of cervical squamous carcinoma.
Hou M; Song K; Ren J; Wang K; Guo J; Niu Y; Li Z; Han D
BMC Cancer; 2022 Jan; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35057777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging.
Zhu SC; Liu YH; Wei Y; Li LL; Dou SW; Sun TY; Shi DP
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 24(8):929-940. PubMed ID: 29491686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 24316663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The value of T2 mapping for evaluating the pathological type, grade and depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma].
Li SJ; Zhang ZX; Liu J; Wang WJ; Wang J; Zhang Y; Cheng JL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 45(8):673-680. PubMed ID: 37580272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
Zhang J; Chen X; Chen D; Wang Z; Li S; Zhu W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 109():188-195. PubMed ID: 30527302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade.
Kishimoto K; Tajima S; Maeda I; Takagi M; Ueno T; Suzuki N; Nakajima Y
Acta Radiol; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1021-8. PubMed ID: 26486600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging in stratification of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and early diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in a rabbit model.
Li C; Ye J; Peng Y; Dou W; Shang S; Wu J; Jafari R; Gillen KM; Wang Y; Prince M; Luo X
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():267-273. PubMed ID: 31445117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and its correlation with the differentiation process of cervical cancer.
Meng H; Guo X; Zhang D
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Sep; 23(1):144. PubMed ID: 37773061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic parameters of endometrioid carcinoma.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 24339027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer.
Tamai K; Koyama T; Saga T; Umeoka S; Mikami Y; Fujii S; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):682-7. PubMed ID: 17729360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging for distinguishing histopathologic subtypes and grades of rectal carcinoma.
Wen Z; Chen Y; Yang X; Lu B; Liu Y; Shen B; Yu S
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):8. PubMed ID: 30744694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative analysis for detection and grading of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging.
Li HW; Yan GW; Yang J; Zhuo LH; Bhetuwal A; Long YJ; Feng X; Yao HC; Zou XX; Feng RH; Yang HF; Du Y
Oncol Lett; 2022 Nov; 24(5):403. PubMed ID: 36276491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted and diffusion kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study.
Zou J; Ye J; Zhu W; Wu J; Chen W; Chen R; Zhu Q
Br J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 96(1150):20230146. PubMed ID: 37393526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
