348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30765321)
1. Repetitive Voice Evaluation in Dysphonic Teachers: Office Versus Home.
Jaber B; Remman R; Matar N
J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):675-681. PubMed ID: 30765321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index.
Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e1-646.e10. PubMed ID: 30583889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do Standard Instrumental Acoustic, Perceptual, and Subjective Voice Outcomes Indicate Therapy Success in Patients With Functional Dysphonia?
Reetz S; Bohlender JE; Brockmann-Bauser M
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 29395329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Responsiveness of Persian Version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), Persian Version of Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Praat in Vocal Mass Lesions with Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
Khoramshahi H; Khatoonabadi AR; Khoddami SM; Dabirmoghaddam P; Ansari NN
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):770.e21-770.e30. PubMed ID: 29029830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Voice Self-assessment Protocols: Different Trends Among Organic and Behavioral Dysphonias.
Behlau M; Zambon F; Moreti F; Oliveira G; de Barros Couto E
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):112.e13-112.e27. PubMed ID: 27210475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Dysphonia Severity Index in the Dr. Speech Program.
Kim H; Gao S; Yi B; Shi R; Wan Q; Huang Z
J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e23-948.e29. PubMed ID: 31526665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multidimensional Assessment of the Effectiveness of Group Voice Therapy.
Cantarella G; Torretta S; Ferruta S; Ciabatta A; Manfredi C; Pignataro L; Dejonckere P
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):714-721. PubMed ID: 28259606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of VHI scores in teachers with voice disorders and the non-professional dysphonic population].
Kuzańska A; Niebudek-Bogusz E; Woźnicka E; Kopczyńska J; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Med Pr; 2009; 60(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 19928428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between acoustic parameters and Voice Handicap Index in dysphonic teachers.
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Woznicka E; Zamyslowska-Szmytke E; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2010; 62(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 20093845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.
Englert M; Latoszek BBV; Behlau M
J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):567-571. PubMed ID: 35022153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of cepstral coefficients to other voice evaluation parameters in patients with occupational dysphonia].
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Strumiłło P; Wiktorowicz J; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Med Pr; 2013; 64(6):805-16. PubMed ID: 24645566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.
Kopf LM; Jackson-Menaldi C; Rubin AD; Skeffington J; Hunter EJ; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):691-696. PubMed ID: 28318967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of the acoustic voice quality index for objective measurement of dysphonia severity.
Núñez-Batalla F; Díaz-Fresno E; Álvarez-Fernández A; Muñoz Cordero G; Llorente Pendás JL
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017; 68(4):204-211. PubMed ID: 28213999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Influence of Occupation on Self-perceived Vocal Problems in Patients With Voice Complaints.
Ebersole B; Soni RS; Moran K; Lango M; Devarajan K; Jamal N
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):673-680. PubMed ID: 28967587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining Relationships Between GRBAS Ratings and Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Patient-Reported Voice Measures in Adults With Voice Disorders.
Fujiki RB; Thibeault SL
J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):390-397. PubMed ID: 33750626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
