These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3076552)

  • 21. Simultaneous activation technique: an alternative for bonding composite resin to glass ionomer.
    Pinheiro SL; Oda M; Matson E; Duarte DA; Guedes-Pinto AC
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 12889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of interfacial bond strengths between amalgam and composite inlay.
    Abdel-Aziz AH; Alhadainy HA
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 9823075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical evaluation of bonding with glass ionomer cement.
    Ravindranath VK; Kapoor DN; Sharma VP
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1993 Mar; 7(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 9791242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of the dentin bonding agents. Part II. A comparison of glass ionomer cement with dentin bonding agents.
    Leinfelder KF; Russell CM; Thornton RJ; Cowen RG; Walker CK
    J Ala Dent Assoc; 1986; 70(2):15-22. PubMed ID: 3519722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the bond strengths of composite resins and glass ionomer cements.
    Murray GA; Yates JL
    J Pedod; 1984; 8(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 6374093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modern alternatives to amalgam: cementable restorations and inlays.
    Wirz J; Jaeger K
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Aug; 30(8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10635268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading.
    Wiskott HW; Belser UC; Scherrer SS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10635194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strengths of a porcelain material to different abutment substrates.
    Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Vichi A; Goracci G
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 11203834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of etchant and cement age on the adhesion of resin composite to conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Brackett WW; Huget EF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9063213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META.
    Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Coury TL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 9693653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative evaluation of strength of various core restorative materials for endodontically treated anterior teeth.
    Dabas VK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2000; 11(4):139-44. PubMed ID: 11307637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Esthetic veneering: materials and techniques.
    Pollack BF; Blitzer MH
    Gen Dent; 1983; 31(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 6373486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of cement space and delayed placement on the seating of crowns luted with Vitremer, Fuji Duet and Dyract Cem.
    Wilson PR; Stankiewicz NR
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):240-4. PubMed ID: 10388384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strength of prosthodontic luting materials to titanium after localized cyclic loading.
    Taira Y; Suzuki S; Givan DA; Lacefield W; Atsuta M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 11764111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.