These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3076557)

  • 21. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel.
    Jain P; Stewart GP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11203791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retentive properties and film thickness of 18 luting agents and systems.
    Pameijer CH; Jefferies SR
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 9515394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro comparison of filled and unfilled universal bonding agents of amalgam to dentin.
    Bagley A; Wakefield CW; Robbins JW
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 9028247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of amalgam surface preparation on the shear bond strength between composite and amalgam.
    Ruse ND; Sekimoto RT; Feduik D
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(5):180-5. PubMed ID: 8710696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.
    De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B; Satoshi I; Vargas M; Yoshida Y; Armstrong S; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):414-20. PubMed ID: 15002958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
    Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictable adhesion to dentin and enamel.
    Strassler HE
    MSDA J; 1995; 38(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 9569866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bonding of amalgam to dentine: microleakage and shear bond strength evaluation.
    van der Vyver PJ; de Wet FA; Kearney WD; de Nysschen D
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Aug; 51(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 9461930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shear bond strength of resin-mediated amalgam-dentin attachment after cyclic loading.
    McComb D; Brown J; Forman M
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):236-40. PubMed ID: 8710705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment.
    Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Mattar D; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):647-60. PubMed ID: 14531614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems.
    Piemjai M; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 17672830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of dentin bonding and ferrule preparation on the fracture strength of crowned teeth restored with dowels and amalgam cores.
    Aykent F; Kalkan M; Yucel MT; Ozyesil AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 95(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 16616127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of in-office in combination with intracoronal bleaching on enamel and dentin bond strength and dentin morphology.
    Amaral C; Jorge A; Veloso K; Erhardt M; Arias V; Rodrigues JA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):17-24. PubMed ID: 18633465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of moist bonding on composite/enamel bond strength.
    Moll K; Gärtner T; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 12092997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; De Munck J; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jun; 22(6):533-44. PubMed ID: 16300826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Resin adhesion to the primary enamel: influence of light-irradiation times.
    Hosoya Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8611487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface treatment effects on amalgam repair strength.
    Diefenderfer KE; Reinhardt JW; Brown SB
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9545913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces.
    Martínez-Insua A; Da Silva Dominguez L; Rivera FG; Santana-Penín UA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 11005900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.