These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30766496)

  • 1. A Short Note on Aberrant Responses Bias in Item Response Theory.
    Jia B; Zhang X; Zhu Z
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():43. PubMed ID: 30766496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):573-588. PubMed ID: 30350024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Iterative Scale Purification Procedure on
    Qiu X; Huang SY; Wang WC; Wang YG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 37261427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item-Weighted Likelihood Method for Measuring Growth in Longitudinal Study With Tests Composed of Both Dichotomous and Polytomous Items.
    Xue X; Lu J; Zhang J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():580015. PubMed ID: 34385940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Item Response Model for True-False Exams Based on Signal Detection Theory.
    DeCarlo LT
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):234-248. PubMed ID: 32341609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.
    Shu Z; Henson R; Luecht R
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):481-97. PubMed ID: 25106396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Robust Likelihood Estimators to Mitigate Bias From Rapid Guessing.
    Rios JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):236-249. PubMed ID: 35528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item Response Theory Modeling for Examinee-selected Items with Rater Effect.
    Liu CW; Qiu XL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Sep; 43(6):435-448. PubMed ID: 31452553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo Evaluation of Two-Level Logistic Regression for Assessing Person Fit.
    Woods CM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2008; 43(1):50-76. PubMed ID: 26788972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the Practical Consequences of Model Misfit in Unidimensional IRT Models.
    Crişan DR; Tendeiro JN; Meijer RR
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Sep; 41(6):439-455. PubMed ID: 28804181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sources of Error in IRT Trait Estimation.
    Feuerstahler LM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-375. PubMed ID: 30034054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Entropy-Based Measures for Person Fit in Item Response Theory.
    Dardick WR; Weiss BA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Oct; 41(7):512-529. PubMed ID: 29881103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.
    Magis D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 24016181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting Preknowledge Cheating via Innovative Measures: A Mixture Hierarchical Model for Jointly Modeling Item Responses, Response Times, and Visual Fixation Counts.
    Man K; Harring JR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Oct; 83(5):1059-1080. PubMed ID: 37663535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian Analysis of Aberrant Response and Response Time Data.
    Zhang Z; Zhang J; Lu J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():841372. PubMed ID: 35548497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An IRT Modeling Approach for Assessing Item and Person Discrimination in Binary Personality Responses.
    Ferrando PJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):218-232. PubMed ID: 29881049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.