These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30767052)

  • 1. Gene tree species tree reconciliation with gene conversion.
    Hasić D; Tannier E
    J Math Biol; 2019 May; 78(6):1981-2014. PubMed ID: 30767052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models.
    Chauve C; Ponty Y; Wallner M
    J Math Biol; 2020 Apr; 80(5):1353-1388. PubMed ID: 32060618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural properties of the reconciliation space and their applications in enumerating nearly-optimal reconciliations between a gene tree and a species tree.
    Wu T; Zhang L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S7. PubMed ID: 22151151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Most parsimonious reconciliation in the presence of gene duplication, loss, and deep coalescence using labeled coalescent trees.
    Wu YC; Rasmussen MD; Bansal MS; Kellis M
    Genome Res; 2014 Mar; 24(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 24310000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes.
    Mirkin BG; Fenner TI; Galperin MY; Koonin EV
    BMC Evol Biol; 2003 Jan; 3():2. PubMed ID: 12515582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring incomplete lineage sorting, duplications, transfers and losses with reconciliations.
    Chan YB; Ranwez V; Scornavacca C
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Nov; 432():1-13. PubMed ID: 28801222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact Algorithms for Duplication-Transfer-Loss Reconciliation with Non-Binary Gene Trees.
    Kordi M; Bansal MS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(4):1077-1090. PubMed ID: 28622673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconciliation revisited: handling multiple optima when reconciling with duplication, transfer, and loss.
    Bansal MS; Alm EJ; Kellis M
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):738-54. PubMed ID: 24033262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fast algorithm for the reconciliation of gene trees and LGT networks.
    Scornavacca C; Mayol JCP; Cardona G
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 418():129-137. PubMed ID: 28111320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Complexity of Duplication-Transfer-Loss Reconciliation with Non-Binary Gene Trees.
    Kordi M; Bansal MS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017; 14(3):587-599. PubMed ID: 28055898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the impact of uncertain gene tree rooting on duplication-transfer-loss reconciliation.
    Kundu S; Bansal MS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 9):290. PubMed ID: 30367593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An efficient method for exploring the space of gene tree/species tree reconciliations in a probabilistic framework.
    Doyon JP; Hamel S; Chauve C
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 21464510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the space of gene/species reconciliations with transfers.
    Chan YB; Ranwez V; Scornavacca C
    J Math Biol; 2015 Nov; 71(5):1179-209. PubMed ID: 25502987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconciliation of a gene network and species tree.
    Chan YB; Robin C
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Jul; 472():54-66. PubMed ID: 30951730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring gene duplications, transfers and losses can be done in a discrete framework.
    Ranwez V; Scornavacca C; Doyon JP; Berry V
    J Math Biol; 2016 Jun; 72(7):1811-44. PubMed ID: 26337177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient algorithms for the reconciliation problem with gene duplication, horizontal transfer and loss.
    Bansal MS; Alm EJ; Kellis M
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(12):i283-91. PubMed ID: 22689773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconciliation Reconsidered: In Search of a Most Representative Reconciliation in the Duplication-Transfer-Loss Model.
    Grueter M; Duran K; Ramalingam R; Libeskind-Hadas R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(6):2136-2143. PubMed ID: 31722482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RecPhyloXML: a format for reconciled gene trees.
    Duchemin W; Gence G; Arigon Chifolleau AM; Arvestad L; Bansal MS; Berry V; Boussau B; Chevenet F; Comte N; Davín AA; Dessimoz C; Dylus D; Hasic D; Mallo D; Planel R; Posada D; Scornavacca C; Szöllosi G; Zhang L; Tannier É; Daubin V
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 34(21):3646-3652. PubMed ID: 29762653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconciliation with non-binary species trees.
    Vernot B; Stolzer M; Goldman A; Durand D
    J Comput Biol; 2008 Oct; 15(8):981-1006. PubMed ID: 18808330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computing the Diameter of the Space of Maximum Parsimony Reconciliations in the Duplication-Transfer-Loss Model.
    Haack J; Zupke E; Ramirez A; Wu YC; Libeskind-Hadas R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 29994484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.