These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30767052)

  • 41. Support measures to estimate the reliability of evolutionary events predicted by reconciliation methods.
    Nguyen TH; Ranwez V; Berry V; Scornavacca C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e73667. PubMed ID: 24124449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Inferring duplication episodes from unrooted gene trees.
    Paszek J; Górecki P
    BMC Genomics; 2018 May; 19(Suppl 5):288. PubMed ID: 29745844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Co-divergence and tree topology.
    Calamoneri T; Monti A; Sinaimeri B
    J Math Biol; 2019 Aug; 79(3):1149-1167. PubMed ID: 31203388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Unified modeling of gene duplication, loss, and coalescence using a locus tree.
    Rasmussen MD; Kellis M
    Genome Res; 2012 Apr; 22(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 22271778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of Incomplete Lineage Sorting On Tree-Reconciliation-Based Inference of Gene Duplication.
    Zheng Y; Zhang L
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(3):477-85. PubMed ID: 26356016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Unconstrained Diameters of the Duplication-Loss Cost and the Loss Cost.
    Gorecki P; Eulenstein O; Tiuryn J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(6):2125-2135. PubMed ID: 31150345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Deciphering Microbial Gene Family Evolution Using Duplication-Transfer-Loss Reconciliation and RANGER-DTL.
    Bansal MS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2569():233-252. PubMed ID: 36083451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. GeneRax: A Tool for Species-Tree-Aware Maximum Likelihood-Based Gene  Family Tree Inference under Gene Duplication, Transfer, and Loss.
    Morel B; Kozlov AM; Stamatakis A; Szöllősi GJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Sep; 37(9):2763-2774. PubMed ID: 32502238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Resolution and reconciliation of non-binary gene trees with transfers, duplications and losses.
    Jacox E; Weller M; Tannier E; Scornavacca C
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):980-987. PubMed ID: 28073758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Identifying duplications and lateral gene transfers simultaneously and rapidly.
    Chen ZZ; Deng F; Wang L
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):2150033. PubMed ID: 34895113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. ecceTERA: comprehensive gene tree-species tree reconciliation using parsimony.
    Jacox E; Chauve C; Szöllősi GJ; Ponty Y; Scornavacca C
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(13):2056-8. PubMed ID: 27153713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. GATC: a genetic algorithm for gene tree construction under the Duplication-Transfer-Loss model of evolution.
    Noutahi E; El-Mabrouk N
    BMC Genomics; 2018 May; 19(Suppl 2):102. PubMed ID: 29764363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On the computational complexity of the maximum parsimony reconciliation problem in the duplication-loss-coalescence model.
    Bork D; Cheng R; Wang J; Sung J; Libeskind-Hadas R
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2017; 12():6. PubMed ID: 28316640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cubic time algorithms of amalgamating gene trees and building evolutionary scenarios.
    Lyubetsky VA; Rubanov LI; Rusin LY; Gorbunov KY
    Biol Direct; 2012 Dec; 7():48. PubMed ID: 23259766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Generalizing the Domain-Gene-Species Reconciliation Framework to Microbial Genes and Domains.
    Mondal A; Bansal MS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2023; 20(6):3511-3522. PubMed ID: 37436868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bayesian gene/species tree reconciliation and orthology analysis using MCMC.
    Arvestad L; Berglund AC; Lagergren J; Sennblad B
    Bioinformatics; 2003; 19 Suppl 1():i7-15. PubMed ID: 12855432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. DTL reconciliation repair.
    Ma W; Smirnov D; Libeskind-Hadas R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 3):76. PubMed ID: 28361686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. DTL-RnB: Algorithms and Tools for Summarizing the Space of DTL Reconciliations.
    Ma W; Smirnov D; Forman J; Schweickart A; Slocum C; Srinivasan S; Libeskind-Hadas R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(2):411-421. PubMed ID: 26955051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evolution through segmental duplications and losses: a Super-Reconciliation approach.
    Delabre M; El-Mabrouk N; Huber KT; Lafond M; Moulton V; Noutahi E; Castellanos MS
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2020; 15():12. PubMed ID: 32508979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Realistic Gene Transfer to Gene Duplication Ratios Identify Different Roots in the Bacterial Phylogeny Using a Tree Reconciliation Method.
    Bremer N; Knopp M; Martin WF; Tria FDK
    Life (Basel); 2022 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35888084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.