These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30767219)

  • 1. Assessment of cattle inter-individual cluster variability: the potential of continuum data from the farm-to-fork for ultimate beef tenderness management.
    Gagaoua M; Picard B; Monteils V
    J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Jun; 99(8):4129-4141. PubMed ID: 30767219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data from the Farmgate-to-Meat Continuum Including Omics-Based Biomarkers to Better Understand the Variability of Beef Tenderness: An Integromics Approach.
    Gagaoua M; Monteils V; Picard B
    J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Dec; 66(51):13552-13563. PubMed ID: 30512949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision tree, a learning tool for the prediction of beef tenderness using rearing factors and carcass characteristics.
    Gagaoua M; Monteils V; Picard B
    J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Feb; 99(3):1275-1283. PubMed ID: 30073653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body traits, carcass characteristics and price of cull cows as affected by farm type, breed, age and calving to culling interval.
    Gallo L; Sturaro E; Bittante G
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):696-704. PubMed ID: 27461739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of beef carcass and meat traits from rearing factors in young bulls and cull cows.
    Soulat J; Picard B; Léger S; Monteils V
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1712-26. PubMed ID: 27136029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beef Tenderness Prediction by a Combination of Statistical Methods: Chemometrics and Supervised Learning to Manage Integrative Farm-To-Meat Continuum Data.
    Gagaoua M; Monteils V; Couvreur S; Picard B
    Foods; 2019 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 31336646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and partial least square regression on crossbreed Angus-Nellore bulls feedlot finished.
    Lopes LSF; Ferreira MS; Baldassini WA; Curi RA; Pereira GL; Machado Neto OR; Oliveira HN; Silva JAIV; Munari DP; Chardulo LAL
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Nov; 52(6):3655-3664. PubMed ID: 32960399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterisation of beef production systems and their effects on carcass and meat quality traits of Piemontese young bulls.
    Savoia S; Brugiapaglia A; Pauciullo A; Di Stasio L; Schiavon S; Bittante G; Albera A
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jul; 153():75-85. PubMed ID: 30913411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of organic, conventional and intensive beef farm systems: health, management and animal production.
    Blanco-Penedo I; López-Alonso M; Shore RF; Miranda M; Castillo C; Hernández J; Benedito JL
    Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1503-11. PubMed ID: 23031524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cluster analysis application identifies muscle characteristics of importance for beef tenderness.
    Chriki S; Gardner GE; Jurie C; Picard B; Micol D; Brun JP; Journaux L; Hocquette JF
    BMC Biochem; 2012 Dec; 13():29. PubMed ID: 23259756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of young dairy bull beef derived from two breed types across five production systems employing two first season feeding regimes.
    Nian Y; Allen P; Prendiville R; Kerry JP
    J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Mar; 98(5):1914-1926. PubMed ID: 28906556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of Biomarkers Associated with the Rearing Practices, Carcass Characteristics, and Beef Quality: An Integrative Approach.
    Gagaoua M; Monteils V; Couvreur S; Picard B
    J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Sep; 65(37):8264-8278. PubMed ID: 28844145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of castration and carcass suspension method on the quality and fatty acid profile of beef from male dairy cattle.
    Nian Y; Allen P; Harrison SM; Kerry JP
    J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Aug; 98(11):4339-4350. PubMed ID: 29430648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the rearing managements and carcass traits on the sensory properties of two muscles: Longissimus thoracis and rectus abdominis.
    Soulat J; Picard B; Monteils V
    Meat Sci; 2020 Nov; 169():108204. PubMed ID: 32502921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carcass characteristics of cattle differing in Jersey proportion.
    Berry DP; Judge MJ; Evans RD; Buckley F; Cromie AR
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11052-11060. PubMed ID: 30268620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of growth potential and growth path on tenderness of beef longissimus muscle from bulls and steers.
    Purchas RW; Burnham DL; Morris ST
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Dec; 80(12):3211-21. PubMed ID: 12542162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
    Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant strategies during feeding: impact on carcass grades and consumer acceptability.
    Roeber DL; Cannell RC; Belk KE; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jul; 78(7):1867-74. PubMed ID: 10907829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of castration and time-on-feed on Mertolenga breed beef quality.
    Monteiro AC; Navas DR; Lemos JP
    Animal; 2014 Apr; 8(4):675-82. PubMed ID: 24636828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of repetitive use of hormonal implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings of beef palatability.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Apr; 81(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 12723088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.