227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30769197)
1. Partisan mathematical processing of political polling statistics: It's the expectations that count.
Niemi L; Woodring M; Young L; Cordes S
Cognition; 2019 May; 186():95-107. PubMed ID: 30769197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O
Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Touching the base: heart-warming ads from the 2016 U.S. election moved viewers to partisan tears.
Seibt B; Schubert TW; Zickfeld JH; Fiske AP
Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 29510656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives.
Ditto PH; Liu BS; Clark CJ; Wojcik SP; Chen EE; Grady RH; Celniker JB; Zinger JF
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Mar; 14(2):273-291. PubMed ID: 29851554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
Raccuia L
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Social Security: a financial appraisal for the median voter.
Galasso V
Soc Secur Bull; 2001-2002; 64(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 12428510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.
Lundberg KB; Payne BK
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85680. PubMed ID: 24489666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pragmatic bias impedes women's access to political leadership.
Corbett C; Voelkel JG; Cooper M; Willer R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Feb; 119(6):. PubMed ID: 35105805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dominance, politics, and physiology: voters' testosterone changes on the night of the 2008 United States presidential election.
Stanton SJ; Beehner JC; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Labar KS
PLoS One; 2009 Oct; 4(10):e7543. PubMed ID: 19844583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
Granberg D; Burlison J
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations.
Jimenez R; Hidalgo M; Klimek P
Sci Adv; 2017 Jun; 3(6):e1602363. PubMed ID: 28695193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. Midterms.
Yang F; Cai M; Mortenson C; Fakhari H; Lokmanoglu AD; Hullman J; Franconeri S; Diakopoulos N; Nisbet EC; Kay M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Jan; 30(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 37930916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contextual priming: where people vote affects how they vote.
Berger J; Meredith M; Wheeler SC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(26):8846-9. PubMed ID: 18574152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elections have Consequences: Partisan Politics may be Literally Killing Us.
Maas A; Lu L
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2021 Jan; 19(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 33336326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Persuadable voters decided the 2022 midterm: Abortion rights and issues-based frameworks for studying election outcomes.
Kann C; Ebanks D; Morrier J; Alvarez RM
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0294047. PubMed ID: 38241402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference.
Caprara GV; Zimbardo PG
Am Psychol; 2004 Oct; 59(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 15491254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
