These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30769197)

  • 21. Causes and consequences of expectation trajectories: "high" on optimism in a public ballot initiative.
    Krizan Z; Sweeny K
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):706-14. PubMed ID: 23548275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?
    Friese M; Smith CT; Plischke T; Bluemke M; Nosek BA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44130. PubMed ID: 22952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities on their experience of voting in UK general elections.
    Manktelow N; Chadwick DD; Brewster S; Tilly L
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2023 May; 36(3):629-640. PubMed ID: 36918746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When endocrinology and democracy collide: emotions, cortisol and voting at national elections.
    Waismel-Manor I; Ifergane G; Cohen H
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2011 Nov; 21(11):789-95. PubMed ID: 21482457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A meta-analysis of the 2004 campaign polls: an analogy to practice and publication in psychology.
    Collings RD; Eaton LG; Hendrickson M
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):847-56. PubMed ID: 17688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Civil unions in Vermont: political attitudes, religious fundamentalism, and sexual prejudice.
    Saucier DA; Cawman AJ
    J Homosex; 2004; 48(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 15774415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.
    Westen D; Blagov PS; Harenski K; Kilts C; Hamann S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1947-58. PubMed ID: 17069484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Irrelevant events affect voters' evaluations of government performance.
    Healy AJ; Malhotra N; Mo CH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(29):12804-9. PubMed ID: 20615955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election.
    Stanton SJ; Labar KS; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Beehner JC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jun; 35(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 19962831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The dual nature of partisan prejudice: Morality and identity in a multiparty system.
    Viciana H; Hannikainen IR; Gaitán Torres A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219509. PubMed ID: 31310625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Part of the gender gap in voting for Democrats arises because a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black.
    England P; Hout M; Vilbig K; Wells K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(25):e2221910120. PubMed ID: 37307489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
    Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (and if so, How)?
    Beall AT; Hofer MK; Schaller M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 26976083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions.
    Hall L; Strandberg T; Pärnamets P; Lind A; Tärning B; Johansson P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60554. PubMed ID: 23593244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are We Rational or Not? The Exploration of Voter Choices during the 2016 Presidential and Legislative Elections in Taiwan.
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Yen NS; Tsai CH; Cheng HP
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1762. PubMed ID: 29075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neither ideologues nor agnostics: alternative voters' belief system in an age of partisan politics.
    Baldassarri D; Goldberg A
    AJS; 2014 Jul; 120(1):45-95. PubMed ID: 25705780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating Pre-election Polling Estimates Using a New Measure of Non-ignorable Selection Bias.
    West BT; Andridge RR
    Public Opin Q; 2023; 87(Suppl 1):575-601. PubMed ID: 37705923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.