These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations. Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance. Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Composite resins. Restoration of a fractured tooth. Clinical case]. Matson E; Silveira E; Kikuchi HK Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1980; 34(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 6933650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoration of Class IV lesions and fractures with acid-etch composite. Sebor RJ Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1983; 4(6):510-3, 515. PubMed ID: 6583045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth. Oskoee PA; Ajami AA; Navimipour EJ; Oskoee SS; Sadjadi J J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 19249607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reconstruction of fractured teeth using composite resins]. Skrinjarić I Acta Stomatol Croat; 1983; 17(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 6369952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. Steele A; Johnson BR J Endod; 1999 Jan; 25(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10196835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture toughness of pin-retained class 4 restorations. Attin T; Hellwig E; Hilgers RD; Zimmermann U Oper Dent; 1994; 19(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9028250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of composite resins for repairing molars, with special reference to their differences from amalgam]. Hosoda H; Takatsu T DE J Dent Eng; 1983; (65):1-15. PubMed ID: 6409511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]