These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30770302)

  • 1. Thermal cautery-assisted circumcision and principles of its use to decrease complication rates.
    Akyüz O; Bodakçi MN; Tefekli AH
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):186.e1-186.e8. PubMed ID: 30770302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is it safe to use a thermocautery device for circumcision? Examination of the histopathological changes emerging after thermocautery-assisted circumcisions.
    Akyüz O; Tatar Z
    Andrologia; 2021 Apr; 53(3):e13968. PubMed ID: 33421180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of thermocautery-assisted circumcision: retrospective analysis of circumcision performed voluntarily in countries of low socioeconomic status.
    Cakiroglu B; Gozukucuk A; Arda E; Tas T
    Ther Adv Urol; 2019; 11():1756287219882598. PubMed ID: 31662793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collective circumcision performed in Sudan: evaluation in terms of early complications and alternative practice.
    Arslan D; Kalkan M; Yazgan H; Ünüvar U; Şahin C
    Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):864-7. PubMed ID: 23465159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of Complications Following Thermocautery-assisted Circumcisions.
    Tuncer AA; Deger M
    Urol J; 2018 Nov; 15(6):359-364. PubMed ID: 29616499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of histopathological changes of scalpel, monopolar, bipolar, and thermocautery applications in rat experimental circumcision model.
    Tuncer AA; Bozkurt MF; Bayraktaroğlu A; Koca HB; Doğan I; Çetinkursun S; Embleton DB
    Am J Transl Res; 2017; 9(5):2306-2313. PubMed ID: 28559981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gomco circumcision in the office in patients heavier than 5.5 Kg and/or older than 3 months.
    Villanueva CA; Salevitz D
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Dec; 19(6):801.e1-801.e5. PubMed ID: 37633823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of short and long term complications of thermocautery, plastic clamping, and surgical circumcision techniques.
    Tuncer AA; Erten EEA
    Pak J Med Sci; 2017; 33(6):1418-1423. PubMed ID: 29492070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Major penile injuries as a result of cautery during newborn circumcision.
    Seleim HM; Elbarbary MM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Sep; 51(9):1532-7. PubMed ID: 27185337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive circumcision with a novel plastic clamp technique: a review of 7,500 cases.
    Senel FM; Demirelli M; Oztek S
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2010 Jul; 26(7):739-45. PubMed ID: 20532526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of post-circumcision necrosis of the penis: the medicolegal aspect.
    Tasci AI; Danacioglu YO; Arikan Y; Colakoglu Y; Yapar B; Buyuk Y
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2020 Apr; 36(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 32088740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision of circumcision in children: Report of 56 cases.
    Brisson PA; Patel HI; Feins NR
    J Pediatr Surg; 2002 Sep; 37(9):1343-6. PubMed ID: 12194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complication of newborn circumcision: Meatal stenosis or meatal web?
    Özen MA; Gündoğdu G; Taşdemir M; Eroğlu E
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Dec; 13(6):617.e1-617.e4. PubMed ID: 28623142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Management of Phimosis Seen after Circumcision with Thermocautery.
    Akyüz O; Çam K
    Urol J; 2020 Jan; 17(1):50-54. PubMed ID: 31912476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Circumcision revision in male children.
    Al-Ghazo MA; Banihani KE
    Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(4):454-8. PubMed ID: 16953915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Circumcision with Thermocautery after Local Anesthesia in Males: A Retrospective Single-center Study with 1821 Patients.
    Uysal M; Şanlı A
    Urol J; 2022 Apr; 19(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 35466390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pediatric sutureless circumcision: an effective and cost efficient alternative.
    Voznesensky M; Mutter C; Hayn M; Kinkead T; Jumper B
    Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):7995-9. PubMed ID: 26432971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male infants: a multi-centre study.
    Jimoh BM; Odunayo IS; Chinwe I; Akinfolarin OO; Oluwafemi A; Olusanmi EJ
    Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 23():35. PubMed ID: 27200140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circumcision and complications in patients with haemophilia in southern part of Turkey: Çukurova experience.
    Sasmaz I; Antmen B; Leblebisatan G; Şahin Karagün B; Kilinç Y; Tuncer R
    Haemophilia; 2012 May; 18(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 22176339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children.
    Bastos Netto JM; Gonçalves de Araújo J; Noronha MF; Passos BR; Lopes HE; Bessa Jd; Figueiredo AA
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 24054384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.