These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30770565)

  • 1. Negative frequency-dependent growth underlies the stable coexistence of two cosmopolitan aquatic plants.
    Armitage DW; Jones SE
    Ecology; 2019 May; 100(5):e02657. PubMed ID: 30770565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A framework for linking competitor ecological differences to coexistence.
    Ousterhout BH; Serrano M; Bried JT; Siepielski AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Oct; 88(10):1534-1548. PubMed ID: 31222738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coexistence mechanisms and the paradox of the plankton: quantifying selection from noisy data.
    Fox JW; Nelson WA; McCauley E
    Ecology; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1774-86. PubMed ID: 20583718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluctuation-independent niche differentiation and relative non-linearity drive coexistence in a species-rich grassland.
    Zepeda V; Martorell C
    Ecology; 2019 Aug; 100(8):e02726. PubMed ID: 30985909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity.
    Schreiber SJ; Yamamichi M; Strauss SY
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02664. PubMed ID: 30773621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signs of stabilisation and stable coexistence.
    Broekman MJE; Muller-Landau HC; Visser MD; Jongejans E; Wright SJ; de Kroon H
    Ecol Lett; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1957-1975. PubMed ID: 31328414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Phylogenetic Relatedness on Fluctuation-Dependent and Fluctuation-Independent Coexistence Mechanisms in Multispecies Communities.
    Zepeda V; Martorell C
    Am Nat; 2021 Jul; 198(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 34143720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pollination outcomes reveal negative density-dependence coupled with interspecific facilitation among plants.
    Bergamo PJ; Susin Streher N; Traveset A; Wolowski M; Sazima M
    Ecol Lett; 2020 Jan; 23(1):129-139. PubMed ID: 31650660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.
    Adler PB; Smull D; Beard KH; Choi RT; Furniss T; Kulmatiski A; Meiners JM; Tredennick AT; Veblen KE
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 29938882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coexistence barriers confine the poleward range of a globally distributed plant.
    Armitage DW; Jones SE
    Ecol Lett; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1838-1848. PubMed ID: 33022085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coexistence of annual plants: generalist seed predation weakens the storage effect.
    Kuang JJ; Chesson P
    Ecology; 2009 Jan; 90(1):170-82. PubMed ID: 19294923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linking niche theory to ecological impacts of successful invaders: insights from resource fluctuation-specialist herbivore interactions.
    Gidoin C; Roques L; Boivin T
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):396-406. PubMed ID: 25318584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in moisture duration as a driver of coexistence by the storage effect in desert annual plants.
    Holt G; Chesson P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Mar; 92():36-50. PubMed ID: 24239707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative stable states and alternative endstates of community assembly through intra- and interspecific positive and negative interactions.
    Gerla DJ; Mooij WM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Sep; 96():8-18. PubMed ID: 25018053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal resource partitioning mitigates interspecific competition and promotes coexistence among insect parasites.
    Hood GR; Blankinship D; Doellman MM; Feder JL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Oct; 96(5):1969-1988. PubMed ID: 34041840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling competition, niche, and coexistence between an invasive and a native species in a two-species metapopulation.
    Dubart M; Pantel JH; Pointier JP; Jarne P; David P
    Ecology; 2019 Jun; 100(6):e02700. PubMed ID: 30916784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program.
    Siepielski AM; McPeek MA
    Ecology; 2010 Nov; 91(11):3153-64. PubMed ID: 21141177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of intraspecific phenotypic variation on species coexistence.
    Hausch S; Vamosi SM; Fox JW
    Ecology; 2018 Jun; 99(6):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 29663356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stand dynamics and tree coexistence in an analytical structured model: the role of recruitment.
    Angulo Ó; Bravo de la Parra R; López-Marcos JC; Zavala MA
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Sep; 333():91-101. PubMed ID: 23707411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Looks can be deceiving: ecologically similar exotics have different impacts on a native competitor.
    Wainwright CE; Holt RD; Mayfield MM
    Oecologia; 2019 Aug; 190(4):927-940. PubMed ID: 31300925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.